A year ago this January, well known and beloved Canadian poet P.K. Page died. She was 93. In the latter part of her career, Page wrote some children’s books, and in particular a poem called “A Grain of Sand” (Fitzhenry and Whiteside, 2003) that was illustrated by Vladyana Krykorka. A Grain of Sand is a very short book, based on the famous lines of poet William Blake – To See a World in a Grain of Sand/And Heaven in a Wild Flower. It was written at the request of Derek Holman for his oratario, An Invisible Reality.
The book is very simple with lush illustrations expressing what it is to be filled with wonder and awe as a child, and how one’s imagination “Can see in a daisy in the grass/Angels and archangels pass” or “See outer space become so small/That the hand of a child could hold it all.” I’m not surprised at all that Page was requested to write this book as she is a poet most fond of the mystical paradoxes of life, some of which are hard to grasp for children. My daughter, for one, found this book perplexing; however, I enjoyed exposing her to it nonetheless — call it paradoxical parenting! That some things indeed, are a mystery is part of this book’s appeal.
For more on P.K. Page, you might want to check out the Canadian literary journal The Malahat Review‘s P.K. Page: A Tribute , but I do also recommend her books. The Glass Air was one of my favorites in my undergraduate years.
This week’s Poetry Friday host is Elaine at Wild Rose Reader.
What's all below doesn't directly reflect the above title, but it came to mind as I composed this.
"They don't want Us here."
The phrase comes up whenever racists, xenophobes, English-onlys and Limbaughers rear their little minds to fill the Internet, town halls or periodicals with opinions inevitably blaming immigrants (legal or otherwise), Spanish-speakers or just plain old U.S.-born, English speaking Chicanos for a laundry list of economic, social or educational failings in this country. On the surface, yes, it sounds, looks and smells like "They don't want Us."
I don't buy the argument, nor the victim-mentality it encourages, because it's a simple reaction to an immediate, specific situation, and no matter how accurate it may be, it fails to include the larger, more complex picture.
They problem lies in the signification They. Without proposing a new conspiracy theory or resurrecting a new one, we tend to throw They around to refer to distinct groups, when we might be better off always thinking of it as the distinct whole--U.S. society, meaning to include the predominant (and some fringe) groups, segments of the population, agencies, governmental bodies, body of law, philosophy and discourse.
When we include all that as They, I'd argue They do want Us here. Someone has to maintain the U.S. hotel toilets, motel bedrooms, Calif. gardens, housing developments and restaurant kitchens at a low enough wage and without drawing down on their tax contributions or good-old-Americans will go without. The food won't get harvested and delivered to those restaurant tables without Us. Manipulating the politics and repressing the economies of Latin America has kept that flow of all types of labor immigrants at an economically profitable level for most of our history.
And after we're here, They still want Us here. The racist, anti-immigrant rhetoric should be interpreted to mean, They want Us here as less-educated scapegoats, the kind that will suffer inhuman abuse in all the verbal, physical and psychological ways that America is so adept at devising. Our norms here are that it's okay to cut off funds to immigrant children, accuse their parents of being members of an ignorant race (sic), while at the same time employing Us at substandard wages without benefits, and even recruiting Us to fight the Iraq-Afghan-Pakistan War.
Homeland Security should erect a monstrous billboard on the border, facing northward, stating:
"Don't leave us. We need your labor and sweat and without you we might realize we're all fokked because we'd have to find new scapegoats and there are enough Muslims around to take all the abuse."
So, the next time your Chicano or mexicano friend says, "They don't want Us here," please try to educate them.
For a good exposure and a set of some real moronic responses, go to "Most Oregon schools slow to get English learners proficient" to see how the Oregon government thinks "punishing" school districts for under serving English language learners can be best implemented by providing even less money for that.
To read about a state notorious for never having understood how to educate Us (Chicano and mexicano kids), and where for years teachers have fought against the myopic standards-based CSAP exam, go to Colorado's new educational standards stress strategic thinking. Dumping the old one doesn't mean a new one will be any better, but th
An excellent post that goes beyond the usual victimization that most Chican@s/Mexican@s go through in this country. This is the sort of deep discourse we need not the usually, "they don't like us"...because really that is but the surface of things. Economics and power are at the heart of all these issues, and race is merely used to muddle things.
The cheap labor provided by the very people that right-wing conspiracists claim to hate, hold up this economy that is ready to tank at any moment.
I agree that it's tiresome for Latinos to assume that they're unwanted all the time. It's funny you mention "Limbaughers." I've been listening to Limbaugh for years and have grown to like him -- believe it or not, he's 1000% better than Lou Dobbs. But that's the thing; you have to be specific and not lump everyone together or judge a book by its cover. Many of the people you assume hate Latinos simply have an explicit argument about immigration law and despite what we might assume, they don't hate us and they do want many of us here, just not all of us -- and it's something other than race that determines the difference. :)