Okay, so call this a
Beth loves her students blog-athon day, but I am not going to let the moon get any higher in tonight's sky without celebrating Maggie Ercolani, a student from two years ago, who has her first published piece in the current issue of the
Pennsylvania Gazette. She joins my students
Moira Moody,
Joe Polin, and
Nabil Mehta on these pages, and her story is a triumph—a telling triumph and a living triumph.
Let me explain.
Toward the end of this past summer I received an email from Maggie who I knew, from an earlier exchange, had been looking forward to a summer internship at Macy's with Maggie-style enthusiasm. I saw her name in my in-box, opened her note, then recoiled. It wasn't the story I'd expected. Indeed, Maggie was writing to tell me that she had suffered a stroke in the first hour of the first day of that internship. That she had spent the summer in hospitals and rehab. That she had a new understanding of the father about whom she had written in my class—a father who had experienced a traumatic brain injury when he tumbled from a bike. Maggie wanted to write about what had happened so that she might understand. Would I help her? Of course I would. But oh, Maggie, I said. Oh. Maggie.
But the reason Maggie's piece is in the
Gazette is because Trey Popp, an editor there, took Maggie's story on and worked with her to develop it more fully. They went back and forth, Trey and Maggie, until the piece is what it is today. I am so grateful to Trey, and I am so proud of Maggie—for her perseverance, for her attitude, for the textures in her life.
Please click on
this link to read Maggie's story for yourself.
I'm not actually done talking about those fabulous YoungArts writers yet. Indeed, for the past several weeks, I've been eagerly anticipating the arrival of
Hairography, the book my husband and I created to celebrate the work of these super novas. Bill took the gorgeous portraits; he designed the book. I encouraged and prodded. The National YoungArts Foundation made the publication possible.
Today
Hairography arrives in the students' mailboxes. I am immeasurably happy about that. This, above, is Miss Shelley Hucks, whose beautiful words close the book. And here are some of my words, from the preface:
-->
The thing about being a “master” teacher in the National YoungArts Foundation program is that there are no rules. You are invited to come to Miami in early January, to stand among the finalists of a rigorous national contest, and to divulge (perhaps) who you’ve been, where you’ve traveled, what you’ve learned, what failure taught you, what the dream looks like on the opposite side of the moon. As a writer who has experimented with all genres and published in most, as a person who takes greatest pleasure from watching others soar, as a woman more inclined to listen than to speak, I chose to invite the two dozen bright lights to see themselves new and to report back on their adventures.
Hairography I called it. What does the stuff on the top of your head have to say?How will it say it? What is the mood, the tone, the diction, the lexiconical reach? How does the hair manage to think when it is perpetually leaving itself behind?Is it at peace? Can it know peace? Find the pronoun, name the gender, consider plurals and singulars, tense and tone, or don’t. Write the autobiography of your hair.
Years ago, I wrote a book in the voice of a river—
Flow: The Life and Times of Philadelphia's Schuylkill River—and felt it to be my truest book—my least defended, my most vulnerable. I was speaking in the voice of another, and so I was speaking with undiluted honesty about how I lived lonesomeness, forsakenness, slow faith, trust, and love.
Ever since
Flow, I have encouraged my students to write in the voice of another so that they might better see themselves. Autobiographies of the inanimate have ensued. Autobiographies of the comb, the toothbrush, the flashlight. Autobiographies of the ID card, the pink sweater, the dandelion-tattooed iPhone case, the glass horse, the pipe, the yellow post-it (one year old). While in Miami with the two dozen YoungArts writers, we talked hairography—the pieces I'd asked them to write in the voice of their hair. We reviewed questions of gender, tense, knowledge, research. We talked, specifically, about empathy—about how, forced to see one's own self through the eyes of a constant, silent witness, we grow. Our language changes. Our understanding steeps.
And so: Choose an object or a thing that is always nearby. Imagine yourself into its perspective. See what it teaches you.
Here, for example, is my own hairography. It is speaking to the twenty-four. It is speaking to you.
Hairography
Language like fumes. Language particulate and strange—the caper of a thought, cleaved. Here are some words: Efflorescence. Interjacent. Lagniappe. Rune. Here is the vast task of my existence: to listen. I am electrostatic frizz, I am frump, I am inconvenient. I am fallen, twisted, clawed, resisted, shamed. There are one hundred thousand of me. But in the spaces in between, I breathe.
What I’ve learned (we):
Language is larger than words. Language is song and pace, hurry and pause; take it one shivering um at a time. Language wants to participate and it is afraid and it waits for a sign. Language bends, and any sentence studied might be a poem. Make the poem. Defy the easy tease of ordinary-ness. Live language large. Look at me hanging here, desperate here, curling. Appease me.
You will have noticed some things: In the making of the new there will be consequences. In the struggle to know there will be pain. In the urge to emerge there will be casual disregard. In the arsenal of punctuation, on the snowbanked page, in the sudden silence, answers will be found. Against chemistry, machines, mongers, fads, grandiose insensitivities, and regrettable excess wage war.
Corrugated, coruscated, unfit: Your eyes, through the years, have accused me. Brittle, broken, lied to, lied for, left to wind and winter, smoke and cure, delusion, bedsheets: I yet remain. (We.) I grow old. I wait.
Language like fumes—did you hear me? Language particulate and strange. If my gift is how I listen, your gift must be how you talk into the page. How you tunnel through—cuticle to follicle to brain blood heart. How you—somehow—remain.
What did you say?
For more thoughts on memoir making and prompt exercises, please visit my dedicated Handling the Truth page.
What a deeply moving story this is! And Maggie was so young to have such a thing happen to her. I was 50 when my brain aneurysm ruptured and I was lucky enough to survive without the accompanying stroke that so many have.
But I can sympathize with so much of what she says. I didn't know what an aneurysm rupture was when it happened. My family and friends were what got me through my recuperation. And I definitely had a new outlook on life.
Thank you, Beth, for sharing your student's inspiring story.
What a wonderful essay and an incredible story. Reaffirms my belief that you know only the most inspiring and courageous people. : )
I'm sorry Maggie had to go through this, especially at such a young age. I'm impressed by both her positive attitude and her fine writing. She had a terrific teacher! Thanks for sharing this, Beth, and congratulations to Maggie on being published in the Gazette.
I wonder if The New York Times' "Lives" column takes reprints.