Add a Comment
new posts in all blogs
By: Dianna Dilworth,
on 9/25/2015
Blog: Galley Cat (Mediabistro) (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Scholastic, Book Biz, earnings, Add a tag
.jpg?picon=1806)
By: John Dougherty,
on 7/16/2014
Blog: An Awfully Big Blog Adventure (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: John Dougherty, earnings, ChipLitFest, ALCS, Chipping Norton Literature Festival, Add a tag
I was at the ALCS panel discussion at the House of Commons about which Anne Rooney blogged last week, and it was pretty sobering. The figures as revealed by the ALCS survey are grim: since 2005 authors' median income has dropped by 29% and the percentage of authors making a living solely from writing has declined from 40% to 11.5%.
Yet ALCS also finds that "the wealth generated by the UK creative industries is on the increase... the creative industries are now worth £71.4 billion per year to the UK economy". In fact, it would appear that while authors are being paid less, publishers are doing quite nicely - a situation that the General Secretary of the Society of Authors describes as both unfair and unsustainable.
Meanwhile, dark mutterings and rumblings grow about literary festivals charging ticket prices and paying organisers, booksellers, musicians and entertainers - but not the authors. There's something quite absurd about all of this - the very people who create the product's value not being themselves valued.
There are, however, pockets of hope. The evening before the ALCS discussion I was at another event, at The Ivy in London. This one was organised by the Chipping Norton Literary Festival, of which I am proud to be a patron, and they'd organised it in order to make a very special announcement:
From now on, any profits made from the festival "will be split equally between all authors involved."
I should say that ChipLitFest, as we like to call it, already has a reputation for looking after authors properly - great accommodation, a fabulous green room, lovely meals, and so on - and many other festivals would have rested on their laurels. But from its inception only three years ago, the organisers have been aware that without authors there is no festival; and if anyone should be rewarded for the festival's success, it's the people who create the content.
Any chance of publishers following suit?
_____________________________________________________________________________
John's latest book, Stinkbomb & Ketchup-Face and the Badness of Badgers, is illustrated by David Tazzyman and published by OUP.
Stinkbomb & Ketchup-Face and the Quest for the Magic Porcupine will be published in August.
By: Stroppy Author,
on 7/8/2014
Blog: An Awfully Big Blog Adventure (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: ALCS, earnings, Anne Rooney, Add a tag
This post was going to be a report from yesterday's important debate at the House of Commons, hosted by ALCS, on how authors can be fairly rewarded for their work. But my train was cancelled in the middle of nowhere and so I didn't actually get to the debate. Well done, railways.
The subject of the debate was outlined in an article in yesterday's Guardian: Authors' incomes collapse to 'abject' levels. There are several things wrong with the article, not least its concentration entirely on literary fiction as though that represents all, or even most, books. Most books are non-fiction. Most novels are not literary. But never mind. The survey behind the article actually asked writers of all types of books, even if the Guardian didn't. If you want to read the non-journalised account of the research, it's on the ALCS website.
The gist of it is that writers are a lot poorer than they used to be. As most people seem to think writers earn a lot ("look at JK Rowling") they don't imagine that matters. But they don't and it does. The median income of professional writers, the survey found, is £11,000. That's less in actual numbers, not just in real terms, than 2005 when it was £12,330. If the 2005 figure is adusted to 2014 prices, the drop is from £15,450 to £11,000: a drop of nearly a third in ten years, from poor to poorer. (I checked my own figures - down 25% over the same period.) Few people realise that most of the books their children read in school were written by someone paid between £1,000 and £2,000 for the book and sometimes less (that's before expenses, never mind tax). How long do you think they could afford to spend working on it? The amount I get for a book now is roughly half the amount I would get for a directly comparable book in 2000 (not adjusted for inflation - just bare numbers). Would *you* do your job for less than half the pay you had a decade and a half ago? That's why many writers are giving up writing full time.
The survey gives results for professional writers, which it defines as those who spend most of their earning time writing. That's a useful distinction because if the figures were distorted by people who wrote one book five years ago, it wouldn't be very helpful. But it also points out that the proportion of professional writers who can earn a living from writing alone has fallen from 40% to just 11.5% - most of us have to take on another job, or other freelance work. It wasn't clear whether 'income' meant 'turnover' or earnings after expenses have been subtracted (but before tax has been subtracted). To compare with people in employment, it should be the latter. Most people don't have to pay from their own pocket for the electricity they use in the office, the computer and software they use, and their office phone bill. If it's turnover, the situation is even worse as the cost of the items we have to pay for to do the job has gone up as our income as gone down, so they represent a greater proportion of turnover. - there's less left after paying for them.
There is little general sympathy for writers because we do a job we like and other people believe they would like to do. (It's odd that the same doesn't apply to other people who like their jobs, such as surgeons and landscape gardeners.) Those unsympathetic people probably imagine sitting at a desk in Tuscany for an hour or two each day 'penning' great stories when inspiration strikes. Yeah, right. Dream on. I work a standard 35-40 hour week and none of it is in Tuscany.
I'm principally a children's writer and this blog is about children's writing, so I'll focus on that. It's not a matter of simple market forces. We are not makers of slide rules crying because the world has moved on to calculators. Nor are we writing books people don't want to buy. That sometimes happens - it's an occupational hazard. We spend a long time developing a book and a publisher doesn't want it. Fine - if I've written an unsaleable book, I don't expect to be paid for it. The crux of the matter is that we write books that publishers do want, that do sell, and we are the only link in the chain that doesn't earn enough to live on. Printers and in-house editors haven't seen their income drop. The ALCS report found that professional writers earn only two-thirds of the amount considered to be a living wage. We can't live on the money we earn from the books we write. That average figure is less than a 19-year-old friend of mine earns working in a DIY shop - and his income will go up as he gains experience, not down.
Why should you care? Because if authors can't afford to live on their writing, they won't write as much. Yes, someone will still write fantasy series or some other type of fiction they feel like writing (probably not a writer with years of editorial input building his or her skills, though). But who will write the reading scheme stories, the reluctant-reader novels, the remedial maths texts, the books about space, dinosaurs, tractors, One Direction (God forbid we should lose those)? No one ever dreamed of sitting at a desk in Tuscany writing a comparison of fourteen types of digger, but that is exactly what might fire the imagination and love of reading of a five-year-old. If we kill off professional children's writers, our children and grandchildren will be the collateral damage. It's true - You don't know what you've got until it's gone.
Anne Rooney
aka Stroppy Author
Latest books: Off the Rails and Soldier Boy (reissues), Ransom, June 2014
Go Figure: A Maths Journey (4 titles), Wayland, June 2014
Mega Machine Record Breakers, Carlton, May 2014 (does not include a comparison of 14 different types of digger)
By: Lauren,
on 8/30/2011
Blog: OUPblog (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: *Featured, Sociology, Education, employment, educational, unemployment, lesson, Research Tools, salary, earnings, ethnicity, explorer, wage gap, Images & Slideshows, social explorer, Sydney Beveridge, attainment, degrees, Add a tag
Add a Comment
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: earnings, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 6 of 6
By: Dianna Dilworth,
on 9/25/2015
Blog: Galley Cat (Mediabistro) (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Scholastic, Book Biz, earnings, Add a tag
By: John Dougherty,
on 7/16/2014
Blog: An Awfully Big Blog Adventure (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: John Dougherty, earnings, ChipLitFest, ALCS, Chipping Norton Literature Festival, Add a tag
I was at the ALCS panel discussion at the House of Commons about which Anne Rooney blogged last week, and it was pretty sobering. The figures as revealed by the ALCS survey are grim: since 2005 authors' median income has dropped by 29% and the percentage of authors making a living solely from writing has declined from 40% to 11.5%.Yet ALCS also finds that "the wealth generated by the UK creative industries is on the increase... the creative industries are now worth £71.4 billion per year to the UK economy". In fact, it would appear that while authors are being paid less, publishers are doing quite nicely - a situation that the General Secretary of the Society of Authors describes as both unfair and unsustainable.
Meanwhile, dark mutterings and rumblings grow about literary festivals charging ticket prices and paying organisers, booksellers, musicians and entertainers - but not the authors. There's something quite absurd about all of this - the very people who create the product's value not being themselves valued.
There are, however, pockets of hope. The evening before the ALCS discussion I was at another event, at The Ivy in London. This one was organised by the Chipping Norton Literary Festival, of which I am proud to be a patron, and they'd organised it in order to make a very special announcement:From now on, any profits made from the festival "will be split equally between all authors involved."
I should say that ChipLitFest, as we like to call it, already has a reputation for looking after authors properly - great accommodation, a fabulous green room, lovely meals, and so on - and many other festivals would have rested on their laurels. But from its inception only three years ago, the organisers have been aware that without authors there is no festival; and if anyone should be rewarded for the festival's success, it's the people who create the content.
Any chance of publishers following suit?
_____________________________________________________________________________
John's latest book, Stinkbomb & Ketchup-Face and the Badness of Badgers, is illustrated by David Tazzyman and published by OUP.Stinkbomb & Ketchup-Face and the Quest for the Magic Porcupine will be published in August.
0 Comments on Pockets of hope - John Dougherty as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
By: Stroppy Author,
on 7/8/2014
Blog: An Awfully Big Blog Adventure (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: ALCS, earnings, Anne Rooney, Add a tag
The subject of the debate was outlined in an article in yesterday's Guardian: Authors' incomes collapse to 'abject' levels. There are several things wrong with the article, not least its concentration entirely on literary fiction as though that represents all, or even most, books. Most books are non-fiction. Most novels are not literary. But never mind. The survey behind the article actually asked writers of all types of books, even if the Guardian didn't. If you want to read the non-journalised account of the research, it's on the ALCS website.
 |
| The Poor Poet, Carl Spitzweg, 1839 |
The survey gives results for professional writers, which it defines as those who spend most of their earning time writing. That's a useful distinction because if the figures were distorted by people who wrote one book five years ago, it wouldn't be very helpful. But it also points out that the proportion of professional writers who can earn a living from writing alone has fallen from 40% to just 11.5% - most of us have to take on another job, or other freelance work. It wasn't clear whether 'income' meant 'turnover' or earnings after expenses have been subtracted (but before tax has been subtracted). To compare with people in employment, it should be the latter. Most people don't have to pay from their own pocket for the electricity they use in the office, the computer and software they use, and their office phone bill. If it's turnover, the situation is even worse as the cost of the items we have to pay for to do the job has gone up as our income as gone down, so they represent a greater proportion of turnover. - there's less left after paying for them.
There is little general sympathy for writers because we do a job we like and other people believe they would like to do. (It's odd that the same doesn't apply to other people who like their jobs, such as surgeons and landscape gardeners.) Those unsympathetic people probably imagine sitting at a desk in Tuscany for an hour or two each day 'penning' great stories when inspiration strikes. Yeah, right. Dream on. I work a standard 35-40 hour week and none of it is in Tuscany.I'm principally a children's writer and this blog is about children's writing, so I'll focus on that. It's not a matter of simple market forces. We are not makers of slide rules crying because the world has moved on to calculators. Nor are we writing books people don't want to buy. That sometimes happens - it's an occupational hazard. We spend a long time developing a book and a publisher doesn't want it. Fine - if I've written an unsaleable book, I don't expect to be paid for it. The crux of the matter is that we write books that publishers do want, that do sell, and we are the only link in the chain that doesn't earn enough to live on. Printers and in-house editors haven't seen their income drop. The ALCS report found that professional writers earn only two-thirds of the amount considered to be a living wage. We can't live on the money we earn from the books we write. That average figure is less than a 19-year-old friend of mine earns working in a DIY shop - and his income will go up as he gains experience, not down.
Why should you care? Because if authors can't afford to live on their writing, they won't write as much. Yes, someone will still write fantasy series or some other type of fiction they feel like writing (probably not a writer with years of editorial input building his or her skills, though). But who will write the reading scheme stories, the reluctant-reader novels, the remedial maths texts, the books about space, dinosaurs, tractors, One Direction (God forbid we should lose those)? No one ever dreamed of sitting at a desk in Tuscany writing a comparison of fourteen types of digger, but that is exactly what might fire the imagination and love of reading of a five-year-old. If we kill off professional children's writers, our children and grandchildren will be the collateral damage. It's true - You don't know what you've got until it's gone.
Anne Rooney
aka Stroppy Author
Latest books: Off the Rails and Soldier Boy (reissues), Ransom, June 2014
Go Figure: A Maths Journey (4 titles), Wayland, June 2014
Mega Machine Record Breakers, Carlton, May 2014 (does not include a comparison of 14 different types of digger)
0 Comments on Killing our darlings as of 7/9/2014 5:03:00 AM
Add a Comment
By: Lauren,
on 8/30/2011
Blog: OUPblog (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: *Featured, Sociology, Education, employment, educational, unemployment, lesson, Research Tools, salary, earnings, ethnicity, explorer, wage gap, Images & Slideshows, social explorer, Sydney Beveridge, attainment, degrees, Add a tag
By Sydney Beveridge, Social Explorer With the new school year approaching, Social Explorer is taking a closer look at education data today and over the years. The most recent available data (from the 2009 American Community Survey) reveal education levels and distinctions among groups, as well as the correlations between educational attainment, income and employment.
0 Comments on Back to school specialPart 1: Education data today as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
Posted on 7/30/2009
Blog: Time Machine, Three Trips: Where Would You Go? (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Humor, Comedy, funny, Dinner, job, divorce, will, humorous, witty, fortune cookies, Insults, earnings, amusing, sayings, mother-in law, Add a tag
Blog: Time Machine, Three Trips: Where Would You Go? (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Humor, Comedy, funny, Dinner, job, divorce, will, humorous, witty, fortune cookies, Insults, earnings, amusing, sayings, mother-in law, Add a tag
Image via Wikipedia
Guess who’s coming over for dinner? It’s your mother-in-law. Are you excited? Well here are ten fortune cookie sayings that you might hear from your dear mother-in-law.
1. You look like a bum. You smell like a bum. I guess you are a bum. I don’t mean to be rude.
2. Get a job! Get off your butt! What’s the matter with you? Have a nice day.
3. You call this cooking? What are you trying to do? Are you trying to poison me? I’ll just have some wine.
4. Lose some weight! You look like my next door neighbor. They call him the Elephant Man.
5. Why did you ever marry my daughter? Where did I go wrong? By the way, wash your face and comb your hair.
6. Did you know that divorce is a seven letter word? You can use it in Scrabble or on some other occasion.
7. I’m ill. Call my doctor! Call my lawyer! Call my psychiatrist! Just get off your ass and start calling.
8. You’re not getting anything from me when I’m dead. I’ve written you out of my will. Now start massaging my feet.
9. Did anyone ever tell you that you bear a striking resemblance to the picture of the serial killer that is terrorizing the city?
10. Good news! Someone is moving into your home to live with you. I’ll give you one guess.
Posted on 7/30/2009
Blog: Time Machine, Three Trips: Where Would You Go? (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Insults, earnings, amusing, sayings, mother-in law, Humor, Comedy, funny, Dinner, job, divorce, will, humorous, witty, fortune cookies, Add a tag
Blog: Time Machine, Three Trips: Where Would You Go? (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Insults, earnings, amusing, sayings, mother-in law, Humor, Comedy, funny, Dinner, job, divorce, will, humorous, witty, fortune cookies, Add a tag
Image via Wikipedia
Guess who’s coming over for dinner? It’s your mother-in-law. Are you excited? Well here are ten fortune cookie sayings that you might hear from your dear mother-in-law.
1. You look like a bum. You smell like a bum. I guess you are a bum. I don’t mean to be rude.
2. Get a job! Get off your butt! What’s the matter with you? Have a nice day.
3. You call this cooking? What are you trying to do? Are you trying to poison me? I’ll just have some wine.
4. Lose some weight! You look like my next door neighbor. They call him the Elephant Man.
5. Why did you ever marry my daughter? Where did I go wrong? By the way, wash your face and comb your hair.
6. Did you know that divorce is a seven letter word? You can use it in Scrabble or on some other occasion.
7. I’m ill. Call my doctor! Call my lawyer! Call my psychiatrist! Just get off your ass and start calling.
8. You’re not getting anything from me when I’m dead. I’ve written you out of my will. Now start massaging my feet.
9. Did anyone ever tell you that you bear a striking resemblance to the picture of the serial killer that is terrorizing the city?
10. Good news! Someone is moving into your home to live with you. I’ll give you one guess.
Add a Comment