How to use this Page

Here is a free coloring page from the book I illustrated for Teresa Ann Power, "The ABCs of Yoga for Kids".  In yoga, focus on breathing is very important.

After reading Transracial Writing for the Sincere by Nisi Shawl, I started thinking how I have avoided creating characters of different cultures in my stories.  I have friends from many different backgrounds and other countries, so why haven’t I included them in my mix of characters? 

First, I don’t see them as different.  Oh, yes most have the telltale signs of English being their second language, but I would never try to reproduce that.  I know I couldn’t do it well.  Other than that and maybe the color of their skin, which I don’t notice, they seem just like me.  But certainly a writer could add depth to a character if they could include the flavor of a different cultures background in their writing. 

Take a minute to read Nisi’s article on how to do just that.  She has a lot of great ideas to help make that happen. 

Here is an excerpt:

If you want to go beyond the level of just assigning different skin tones and heritages to random characters, you’re going to have to do some research. Because yes, all people are the same, but they’re also quite different. For now, we’ll set aside the argument that race is an artificial construct, and concentrate on how someone outside a minority group can gain enough knowledge of the group’s common traits to realistically represent one of its members.

Reading’s a very non-confrontational way to do this. Be sure, though, if you choose this route, to use as many primary sources as possible. If researching a story about first contact between a stranded explorer from Aldeberan and a runaway slave, for example, you’d do much better reading The Life & Times of Frederick Douglass than Uncle Tom’s Cabin. The latter is an important and moving book. But not only is it a work of fiction, it was written by a non-slave; therefore it’s a step further removed from the authentic experience you need.

Websites on minority culture abound. Any half-decent search engine will bring up a freighter’s worth of URLs on African-Americans, for instance, and at least a line or two on lesser-known groups.

For a less cerebral approach, check out nearby ethnic history museums. Art collections, historical dioramas, anthropological displays and so on can provide you with strong visuals. Some are interactive, and allow you to pick up a few aural and tactile sensations as well. For locations, look under “Museums” in the yellow pages, or consult a travel guide for your area.

When it comes to finding more contemporary material, magazines help. I also strongly recommend shopping trips, night-clubbing and restaurant hopping. Take a walk on the wild side. Do you feel like a tourist? Uncomfortable? Well, you are one, and you need to know what it’s like to be conspicuous. If your character’s a minority, she or he will be quite familiar with the sensation. Bruce Sterling once told me that alienation is an essential part of any science fiction writer’s education, and I agree.

Perhaps you have friends of other cultural backgrounds. Talk to them. Explain what you’re trying to do. Even though no one is a certified representative of their own ethnic group, they can let you know when something you propose is totally out of whack. And they can point you to sources of specific info.

If you’re thinking of approaching someone who’s more an acquaintance than a friend, offer to buy them lunch, or dinner, and make the interaction a formal interview. This is what you’d do with anyone else you wanted to pump for valuable data. Cultural background is data. If you want it, and y

By Anatoly Liberman

Of all the ethnic slurs invented for a Jew, Kike is the best-known (a dubious distinction) and the most widely used. Dictionaries prefer to say that its origin is unknown, which is right but uninspiring. By contrast, the Internet and books on ethnic conflict and on American English offer such detailed summaries of opinions that I have little to add, except for outlining the nature of the problem. Some general ideas on the subject can also be found in my earlier post on Sheeny. (Dictionaries usually print such words with low-case letters, but I prefer to capitalize them. Though abhorrent to all decent people, they are, unfortunately, the names of nationalities and should be treated accordingly. That capitalizing ethnic names, the names of the days of the week/ the months of the year, and notional words in titles is silly is another matter, “not germane to the subject,” as a retired colleague of mine used to put it.)

In dealing with Kike, Sheeny, and so forth, the question arises whether the word came into being among the Jews (one group of the Jews may have tried to denigrate another group, as, presumably, happened in the history of Sheeny) or among their persecutors. Nothing is easier than to turn a perfectly innocent word into a slur. Names are perhaps the best candidates for this kind of transformation. Dago has become a mocking term for Italians, Spaniards, and the Portuguese (because so many of them were supposedly called Diego), while Abram (stress on the second syllable) is a great favorite of Russian anti-Semites, partly because it is a prototypical Jewish name and partly because it contains r, a trill the Jews often pronounce with a gh-like sound (“burr”). Hence the conjectures that Kike and Smouch are alterations of Ike “Isaac” and Moshe “Moses” respectively. However, the etymology of a low word, even of a low word inspired by low feelings, has to be investigated according to the same rules that hold for the rest of the vocabulary: one expects a plausible explanation of the sounds and reference to the milieu in which the word under discussion is believed to have emerged. Since no one has accounted for the phonetic change from Ike to Kike and from Moshe to Smouch; both guesses should be rejected without regret.

Another derivation traces Kike to the name Hayyim, transcribed in German as Chaim. Kaim “Jew” was recorded in mid-18th-century German cant. Then, we are told, “since Jewish speakers took -im of Kaim as a plural ending in Hebrew, they created a new singular *kai [an asterisk designates reconstructed, as opposed to attested, forms], which by reduplication gave the form ki-ki,” later simplified to Kike. It is hard to understand why Jewish speakers mistook the last syllable of the name they must have known for centuries for a plural ending. Would any English-speaker identify the final -s of Rose with a plural ending? And how did the reduplication arise? I don’t think this etymology is any better than the previous two.

Two main hypotheses on the origin of Kike are often mentioned. According to the first (its author is J.H.A. Lacher, 1926), the suffix -sky in the Jewish family names of emigrants from Poland and Russia became a linguistic marker of their poor manners (compare the adjective buttinsky, with its implied reference to the behavior of pertinacious Jews). Allegedly, the word arose among the Jews “of German origin, who soon insisted that the business ethics and the standard of living and culture of these Russians were far lower than theirs.” According to J.H.A. Lacher, the snobbish “brethren” of emigrants from the Slavic countries (most of whom ended up as traveling salesmen) called the newcomers kikis. Lacher gives no reference to his sources, except the following: “When I heard the term kikis for the first time at Winona, Minnesota, about forty years ago, it was a Jewish salesman of German descent who used it and explained it to me, but in the course of a few years it disappeared, kike being used instead.” We can assume that i in both syllables of kikis was long (as in the word sky, for instance). How did it develop from the short i/y of -sky? Also, s, the initial consonant of the suffix was supposedly left out and the remaining stub (-ky) reduplicated (again reduplicated!) and pronounced with a long vowel. Given such freedom of phonetic change, almost any combination of sounds can be shown to become any other. (Incidentally, in Minnesota the first vowel of Winona is short; stress falls on the second syllable, which is long.)

The second hypothesis turns round the Yiddish word for “circle” and has two variants. According to the main of them, on Ellis Island those immigrating Jews who knew neither English nor the Roman script were asked to put an X near their names, but looked upon it as a picture of the cross, a symbol of their former persecution, and instead put a circle. One of the variants of the Yiddish word for “circle” can be transcribed as kaykl, and this is said to be the etymon of Kike. Could the English speaking officials on Ellis Island isolate one Yiddish word in the speech of the Jewish people they dealt with, use it mockingly, and make it famous? I am afraid that we have here an example of the rich Ellis Island folklore that produced a Jew Shaun Ferguson and a Chinese man Sam Ting.

In an article by David L. Gold I read a slightly different version of the kaykl etymology, which he endorses, though cautiously. He quotes a letter to the editor of The American Israelite: “It seems probable that drummers [that is, traveling salesmen] called the Russian Jew, who unable to sign his name in English made his handmark in the form of the traditional Kykala [a diminutive form of Kaykl], a Kyke. The term undoubtedly originated as drummer slang.” We will dispense with the adverb undoubtedly, for in etymological research doubts are unavoidable, but accept the propositions that Kike, a disparaging term of Yiddish origin, was coined by the Jews and that its etymon must have contained a long vowel. The letter, dated July 23, 1914, was written relatively soon after the word Kike spread in American English. The OED could not find any mention of it prior to 1904. The tradition ascribing the coining of Kike to Jewish traveling salesmen (hucksters, hawkers, badgers) may be trustworthy. Compare the etymology of the English word slang (it can be found in an earlier post and in my dictionary); it also seems to have been coined by traveling salesmen.

However, the connection between Kike and Kaykl is hard to demonstrate and possible associations are many (couldn’t the reference be to the special routes of the Russian immigrants of Jewish descent or to their circle of support, the in group?). Although we cannot be certain of the word’s origin, we can perhaps account for its popularity. Palindromes (words that remain the same if pronounced backward) often have an expressive character: consider tit, tat, poop, peep, kick, sis, boob, and the rest. Kike is offensive because its very form demeans its target. Peter Tamony, a famous student of American slang, wrote an article on keeks, Kikes, and kooks. He had no linguistic background and sometimes allowed suspicious ideas to run away with him (does anyone still use run away in this sense?). His etymology of Kike hardly merits the briefest mention, but his intuition did not betray him. In a way, Kike indeed belongs with keek and kook. Too bad this linguistic perfection serves such an ugly cause.

Stereotypes

What is up with the ridiculous stereotypes these days? People are just making things up like “all black people look alike”. That is a damn lie because if all black people looked alike everyone would be waking up to a Beyonce or a Denzel Washington. Do not get me wrong; there are some sexy black people other than Beyonce and Denzel but wouldn’t it be nice.  I am just tired of all of the stereo types lingering around and even children are making fun of others. Another one is all black people love chicken. “I in fact hate chicken. I have never eaten a piece of chicken in a while and I am a mixed black guy. I searched and came across some pretty interesting stereotypes.

Check these out!

Italians, Spaniards, Latino-Americans: hot tempered, high sex drives, possibly “prone to crime or violence”

Jews: money-grubbing, excessively influential in the world for some reason, conspiring, conniving

Greeks: can’t trust them, slick, business cheats, restaurant owners

Muslims (not an ethnicity/race but still stereotypes going on about them): possibly disloyal (esp. nowadays in America), possibly radicals or terrorists, can’t be trusted, always covering their face,

French:  arrogant, judgmental, rude (esp. Parisians)

Germans:  prone to militarism, nationalism, and war, anti- Semitic, easily led by a strong dictatorial type leader

Scandinavians:  politically progressive, open-minded, tall, naturally blonde, blue eyed, pale

British: pubs, football, fish and chips, sleazy tabloids, prudish, a bit cocky and arrogant

Irish: drunks, like to fight while drunk, cops (crooked) and firemen (crooked), always singing

Russians: polish, eastern Slavs, communists

Chinese: smart, physically smell, trained to do martial arts, everything is made in China, all look alike, eat with chop sticks, small package

Japanese: all business, good cars

Dutch: wooden shoes, windmills, drugs

Mexicans: Always working, construction workers, own the corner stores, only listen to music like (listen below), and have a lot of kids

Blacks: Look alike, failures, racists, drop-outs, love chicken, and love watermelon

Now what the hell!! We all are human beings; shouldn’t that be all that matters? I hope you all have enjoyed reading my article.

Image via Wikipedia

Now a’ days, when ask you someone (in America) what they “are”, normally the response can seem kind of confusing… for example:

“Oh me? I’m half Asian.”

“Wow, what’s the other half?”

“White.”

“Cool, I’m half Scottish, half German.”

“Awesome.”

Now, this doesn’t seem to confusing to some people, but for me it does. Why? Because they just said that they “are” half Asian- white/half Scottish- German when honestly I feel that they should just stick to one word which is…

Human.

Now, now I get it. We should be proud of our culture and the places our family has come from and stuff, but that’s just what it is… our culture and places our family has come from, in other words, our ethnicity. It’s not who we ARE, since we are HUMAN. Dog’s can be half Asian-White/ half Scottish- German too you know. That’s why sometimes I get confused, a human defining themselves just by there ethnicity doesn’t make sense. If someone asked there ethnicity or background, then we can get the whole “speel” of it, but if it’s just who we are… then I feel human makes sense (Unless you are not human).

So, the next time someone asks you what you ARE. I suggest you ask for a clarification or respond with human, since it’s really the only logical answer.

If you feel you are anything different, please state your breed! =P

Now a’ days, when ask you someone (in America) what they “are”, normally the response can seem kind of confusing… for example:

“Oh me? I’m half Asian.”

“Wow, what’s the other half?”

“White.”

“Cool, I’m half Scottish, half German.”

“Awesome.”

Now, this doesn’t seem to confusing to some people, but for me it does. Why? Because they just said that they “are” half Asian- white/half Scottish- German when honestly I feel that they should just stick to one word which is…

Human.

Now, now I get it. We should be proud of our culture and the places our family has come from and stuff, but that’s just what it is… our culture and places our family has come from, in other words, our ethnicity. It’s not who we ARE, since we are HUMAN. Dog’s can be half Asian-White/ half Scottish- German too you know. That’s why sometimes I get confused, a human defining themselves just by there ethnicity doesn’t make sense. If someone asked there ethnicity or background, then we can get the whole “speel” of it, but if it’s just who we are… then I feel human makes sense (Unless you are not human).

So, the next time someone asks you what you ARE. I suggest you ask for a clarification or respond with human, since it’s really the only logical answer.

If you feel you are anything different, please state your breed! =P