Sort Blog Posts

Sort Posts by:

  • in
    from   

Suggest a Blog

Enter a Blog's Feed URL below and click Submit:

Most Commented Posts

In the past 7 days

Recent Posts

(tagged with 'Little House on the Prairie')

Recent Comments

Recently Viewed

JacketFlap Sponsors

Spread the word about books.
Put this Widget on your blog!
  • Powered by JacketFlap.com

Are you a book Publisher?
Learn about Widgets now!

Advertise on JacketFlap

MyJacketFlap Blogs

  • Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.

Blog Posts by Tag

In the past 7 days

Blog Posts by Date

Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
new posts in all blogs
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Little House on the Prairie, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 25 of 28
1. Cammie McGovern's JUST MY LUCK

Cammie McGovern's Just My Luck is new this year (2016) from HarperCollins. A reader wrote to ask me about it, because Indian in the Cupboard is part of the story.

I started reading it two days ago and kept setting it aside. The main character is a 4th grader named Benny. His brother, George, is in 6th grade, and is "medium-functioning autistic" (p. 16). I hope Disability in Kidlit finds someone to review it. Some time back, I read their review of Anne Ursu's The Real Boy. I love that book. One thing that stood out in the review was that the story is told from the perspective of the autistic child, rather than from outsider's who gawk at him. There are pages in Just My Luck where it feels like someone is gawking at George. 

I got to page 49 and paused. At that point in the story, Benny is with his older brother, Martin, who is on his first date with Lisa. They go into a Barnes & Noble, where Lisa asks Benny what he's reading (p. 49):

She said she knew it sounded childish but her favorite books were still the Little House on the Prairie series that she read when she was in Mr. Norris's class. "I just love them," she said."
Benny has a crush on Lisa, and so, he says he loves them, too. He's never read them, but their mother used to make them watch the TV show. Two weeks later when she's visiting their house, Benny pretends to be reading Little House in the Big Woods. Lisa exclaims that it is her favorite book.

I wonder if McGovern read that book recently? In Little House in the Big Woods, Pa tells the girls how he, as a young boy, would play that he was a mighty hunter stalking wild animals and Indians. Stalking Indians. Do you remember that part of that book? Do you know any other book for kids that has someone hunting another person or people?

I wanted to throw Just My Luck across the room when I got to that part and I want to ask McGovern if she remembers that passage.

On page 64, Lisa tells Benny that Mr. Norris read Indian in the Cupboard aloud to them when she was in his class and that he dressed up as characters, too. That was five years back. Benny is in Mr. Norris's class now and he's not done anything like that. Benny tells his mom that Mr. Norris wasn't reading Indian in the Cupboard to them, so, his mom gets the book from the library and starts reading it aloud, doing the voices as she does (p. 72):
It turns out he's [Little Bear] not only alive, but he's a real person from history, an Iroquois who's fighting battles with the French and English. So Mom has to talk like him, which George loves because he doesn't talk very well. George keeps laughing until Mom tells him it isn't really funny. "In fact," she says, "it perpetuates a lot of negative stereotypes about Native Americans, which is probably why Mr. Norris isn't reading this book out loud to his class anymore."
Then she keeps on reading. She's decided, apparently, that she's going to perpetuate those stereotypes herself. That doesn't add up, does it? And it doesn't seem very caring of her to lay into George like she did, either. She's deliberately being an animated reader, which prompts a response from her autistic son, and she scolds him?! And keeps reading?!

Throughout the next chapters, Benny thinks about toys coming to life. He wants a cupboard so he can bring his Legos to life. Several times, he thinks about Indian in the Cupboard as he develops the idea for how he'll use his Legos to make a movie. Later, they find out why Mr. Norris isn't doing the things he used to do. It isn't because he's recognized the problems in Indian in the Cupboard. It is because he's got to take care of his own autistic son, and he's exhausted. He has no time or energy to do the things he used to do.

I don't like Just My Luck. If Disability in Kidlit reviews it, I'll be back to point to their review. For now, the Native content alone is enough for me to say that I do not recommend Just My Luck. 

0 Comments on Cammie McGovern's JUST MY LUCK as of 6/17/2016 5:14:00 PM
Add a Comment
2. Stereotypical words and images: Gone!

Over the years, I've written about children's books that were revised.

A few days ago I compiled links about revised books (some are mine and some are from others who work in children's literature) and inserted them in my post about A Fine Dessert. Today, I'm putting them on a stand-alone page. If you know of other changes, do let me know. This set of links will eventually appear at Teaching for Change.

We are rarely told why these books were changed, and we're rarely told when the change itself is made.  Some changes are no-change, really, because the ideology of the book (writer?) is still there, beneath the words that get changed. Some changes--like the ones in picture books--are significant. All of them are, nonetheless, important to know about.

0 Comments on Stereotypical words and images: Gone! as of 11/18/2015 11:26:00 AM
Add a Comment
3. Stereotypes in Wilder's THE LONG WINTER

Earlier today, I saw a post on Facebook in which a person said, of Wilder's The Long Winter, "this is the only book that can put what's happening in Boston in perspective. It could be worse, wicked worse."

The woman who wrote that post must think she's being clever, comparing the blizzard in Boston to the one in The Long Winter. 

If you care about accuracy in how Native peoples are depicted, or if you care about how derogatory depictions of Native people impact the growing minds of Native and non-Native children, then I think we'd agree that it is long past time to set aside that series.

Because of their status and 
place of nostalgia in the minds 
of so many Americans, 
few books for children are as wicked 
as those in the Little House on the Prairie series.


Ah---you say, 'there were Indians in The Long Winter?'

Yes. The chapter called "Indian Warning" has a very old Indian man in it. Here's from page 61:
"Heap big snow come," this Indian said.
As he gestured, the blanket he is wearing slides off his shoulder and his "naked brown arm" came out. He continues:
"Heap big snow, big wind," he said.
Pa asks him how long, and of course he says "Many moons" and holds up four, and then three fingers that mean seven months of blizzards.
"You white men," he said. "I tell-um you."
On page 186, the wind grows louder and louder. It reminds Laura of the "Indian war whoops" when Indians were doing "war dances" by the Verdigris River when she was younger.

See what I mean? Stereotypes. Set it aside.




0 Comments on Stereotypes in Wilder's THE LONG WINTER as of 2/14/2015 10:33:00 PM
Add a Comment
4. The Book Review Club - Ancillary Justice

Ancillary Justice
Ann Leckie
science fiction

I am a closet-case sci-fi fan. Or, as multiple book reviews on this blog have probably revealed, maybe not so closet case. I looked forward to reading Ancillary Justice when I'd seen it won the Hugo and Nebula awards. I cut my sci-fi teeth on the likes of Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles and Frank Herbert's Dune in between installments of Little House on the Prairie. That is the seventies in a nutshell. And I figured, if Leckie could beat Andy Weir's The Martian, which I love, in the awards category, I was about to fall in love again.

Let's just say Ancillary Justice and I got off to a rocky start. It was not love at first sight. In fact, the novel frustrated me  (incidentally, it was the same when I first met my husband).

Basic plot - a space ship decides to take revenge on the leader of the culture that made - and ultimately attempts to destroy - it (Ancillary Justice, not my marriage; it's still happily intact).

It's fascinating stuff. AI taken to a whole new level. However, the AI can't decipher female from male and so refers to everyone as "she". Sometimes, gender is specified, but then the ship reverts to calling said characters "she". For me, it made connecting with characters really hard. And that made me wonder, why does gender matters in story? Or rather, does gender matter in story? Should it matter? What does Leckie gain by making her story more or less gender neutral?

I haven't finished figuring all of this out, but I have come to the conclusion that for the story, by making everyone gender neutral, characters become sentient beings. That's it. They have flaws and quirks, but in remaining gender neutral, they never became much deeper than that. This may, in part, have to do with the boundaries of my hermeneutics. I live in a world in which, for the most part, the gender of any person I interact with, is clear. With that comes mounds of unspoken data.  Without that, I have to rethink my world. That is what Leckie forced me, as a reader, to do in her novel. I had to see it through a different lens, a new lens, one I haven't completely finished sanding down yet, and won't, without further interaction.

The absence of gender imploded my hermeneutic structure of interpretation. It made me feel uneasy. And it's kept me feeling uneasy. And thinking. In other words, it's genius.

For more great reads, visit Barrie Summy's website. She's got a bushelful!

Add a Comment
5. Prairie Memories Now Available!

Prairie Memories
$19.99
Magazine – 68 pages – Glossy Coated Paper – 8.5 x 11 Inches – English Language -
Published July 2014

  • Exclusive in-depth interviews with four actors from Little House on the Prairie: Karen Grassle (Caroline Ingalls), 14 pages; Richard Bull (Nels Oleson), 14 pages; Dabbs Greer (Reverend Alden), 14 pages; Katherine MacGregor (Harriet Oleson), 21 pages.
  • The interviews with Richard Bull and Dabbs Greer were made shortly before their death.
  • All pictures published in the magazine are courtesy of the actors. Most of them are very rare and previously unpublished.

Magazine available only through http://prairiememories.bigcartel.com/product/prairie-memories Can be dedicated by the author upon request.

Payment by Paypal or check.

Patrick  Loubatière is a French writer, stage director and high school teacher. He is the author of the book “Little House on the Prairie from A to Z”, which accompanied the complete series on DVD, in 2006. He also interviewed the actors on the bonus segments, plus created the trivia quizzes. 
Since 2006, he has co-starred with Alison Arngrim in France in two comedic, interactive shows based on Little House on the Prairie. 

Aside from Little House, he has published interviews with most of the actors on the series Lost, NCIS, The Mentalist, Desperate Housewives, Criminal Minds, Revenge, Castle, Dallas, etc.

PURCHASE HERE!


0 Comments on Prairie Memories Now Available! as of 8/16/2014 11:49:00 PM
Add a Comment
6. My Laura Ingalls Wilder Adventure

little house

 

Perhaps you didn’t know exactly how nerdy I am, but once I tell you what I am doing you will know for sure. I leave Tuesday for a Laura Ingalls Wilder adventure. I am flying to Wisconsin, where I will meet an Ingalls relative and a Wilder relative. We, along with three other Laura Ingalls Wilder and Little House on the Prairie (television show) fans, will be spending the following eight days visiting some Laura Ingalls Wilder sites and attending a 40th Anniversary Little House on the Prairie Cast Reunion taking place in Walnut Grove, Minnesota over the weekend.

Told you. Total nerd.

This will be the only time I do something like this. My girls aren’t into my whole obsession, so I knew if I planned this it would have to be just me and my friends. I’m not bringing much technology, so I won’t be blogging or posting pictures online until we get back. I’ll be sharing my adventures when we return at my Laura Ingalls Wilder blog: http://lauralittlehouseontheprairie.blogspot.com/


2 Comments on My Laura Ingalls Wilder Adventure, last added: 7/20/2014
Display Comments Add a Comment
7. Jaqueline Joseph Pata, Exec Dir of National Congress of American Indians, on Curriculum/American Indian Students

[Editor's Note: A chronological list of AICL's coverage of the shut-down of the Mexican American Studies classes at Tucson Unified School District is here.]
___________________________________________
 
Jacqueline Joseph Pata (Tlingit)
Jacqueline Johnson Pata, Executive Director of the National Congress of American Indians, was on the lunchtime plenary panel yesterday at the W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Healing for America conference. Among her remarks was one that stood out to me.

We (American Indians) don't need, Pata said, state departments of education telling us what is, or is not, acceptable curriculum for our children. 
 
Pata is absolutely on-target with that remark.
 
Too many of the books our children are asked to read give them stereotypical portrayals of monolithic American Indians as savages who terrorized pioneers, or, tragic heroic figures of the past who fought the good fight but are now all dead and gone.
 
Too many of the assignments our children are asked to complete ask them to answer questions where the right answer is one in which they must agree with that point of view. 

It is no wonder American Indian students disengage from school. Wouldn't you?! It is no surprise that our children drop out at such high rates, and, that so many of them choose to end their own lives. 

We can all do a lot to interrupt that way of teaching, but we've got to have the courage to do it. 
 
Do you have the courage to stop teaching Little House on the Prairie? Though it is much beloved in the United States, it is full of stereotypes, bias, and errors. In it, you see savage Indians scaring Ma, and you see heroic ones who choose to protect Laura and her family from the savage ones. The thing is, both portrayals are incorrect. Embracing them, however, lets Americans feel good about what they have today. In teaching Little House, teachers are miseducating the students in their care.

Native children in those classrooms are not only miseducated, they are--in effect--assaulted. State departments of education are populated by people who love Little House. In that light, it is easy to see why Pata is calling for state departments of education to revisit their actions. 

If you'

0 Comments on Jaqueline Joseph Pata, Exec Dir of National Congress of American Indians, on Curriculum/American Indian Students as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
8. THE WILDER LIFE by Wendy McClure


For those of you who've followed here a while (and even for those who are rather new), you might have caught that I'm a Laura Ingalls Wilder fan. My book, MAY B., was partially inspired by my desire to create my own strong pioneer girl who would feel, in the spirit of Laura Ingalls, both familiar and brave.

If you, too, are a Laura fan, you have to get a hold of Wendy McClure's THE WILDER LIFE: MY ADVENTURES IN THE LOST WORLD OF LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE. As an adult, Wendy rekindles her Laura love and determines she'll learn as much as she can about the Ingalls and their world. Wendy embarks on a butter-churning, midwestern-prairie trekking adventure, where she visits all of Laura's homesites (excluding the Wilders brief stay in Florida), experiments with homesteading techniques (sourdough starter, anyone?), and digs deep into what is real, what is fiction, and what is memory.

Those of us who grew up loving Laura Ingalls have memories of our own. For me, I remember Laura being the first author I "knew." Sure, I'd been exposed to plenty of books before the Little House series, but it was while listening to my father read that I came to understand Laura the girl and Laura the writer were the same person. I was convinced that Laura had actually typed each page in my book, stuck everything together, and sent it to the bookstore.

 Wendy's book covers a lot -- the television series fans vs. the book fans (some of us are both, but lean more one way or the other), the way Laura's books are more fictitious than many realize (For example, LITTLE HOUSE IN THE BIG WOODS actually covers the time before and after LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE; the Ingalls, like many pioneers, had to backtrack before being able to move west again), and the expectation -- and disappointment -- a fan might experience while visiting, as Wendy calls it, Laura World. How much of the books comes from true events? How much of our memories of the Ingalls were partially formed by our own childhood impressions? Where is a fan left in the midst of it all? And why did TV Pa solve so many problems by throwing punches?

For this Laura fan, this book was incredibly satisfying. Wendy, like it or not, you've made a new friend.

Has anyone else read THE WILDER LIFE? What were your impressions? If your name happens to be Stephanie and you babysat me as a girl, don't buy your o

9 Comments on THE WILDER LIFE by Wendy McClure, last added: 2/14/2012
Display Comments Add a Comment
9. Favorite Little House Moments

Whenever I hear the name Laura Ingalls Wilder, or even just think it, a warm homey feeling comes over me like being covered in my grandma's quilt.  Today I'm getting that feeling a lot, since February 7th is Laura Ingalls Wilder's birthday (born in 1867) and she is very much on my mind.

It's been said that Wilder wrote the Little House books to preserve the stories of her childhood for today's children, to help them to understand how much America had changed during her lifetime.  Thanks to her foresight, generations of children have vicariously lived the pioneer experience and gained an appreciation of the difficulties the early homesteaders faced in a way that no history book or adult recitation of "how good we have it" could ever accomplish.

The Little House books have also given readers an opportunity to bond across generations, when the books are lovingly passed along from a parent or grandparent who fell in love with the series during their own childhood. Personally, I read my mother's set--which didn't include The First Four Years, discovered many years after Wilder's death--with their odd square shape and cloth covers, purchased during a time when the author was still alive (Wilder died in 1957 at the age of 90). I have warm memories of reading those old books, pretending I was living in the Ingalls cabin alongside Laura and Mary, and I can't wait to share the series with my own daughter.  Reading even a fraction of the hundreds of customer reviews tells me that the Little House bond is shared by many, and one of the beautiful things about these books is that they are loved by boys and girls alike.

Wilder was 65 in 1932 when her first book, Little House in the Big Woods, was published and her books have remained in print ever since.   In 1954 the American Library Association founded the Laura Ingalls Wilder Award, the first one given to its namesake, and now awarded every two years to "an author or illustrator whose books, published in the United States, have made, over a period of years, a substantial and lasting contribution to literature for children." The current winner is Tomie dePaola, who received the award in 2011.  Besides the children's book award, there are museums, elementary schools (including one in my hometown), countless books, blogs, and websites--even a crater on Venus named for Laura Ingalls Wilder. And then, of course, there was the wildly popular television show that brought Laura, most notably in the form of Melissa Gilbert, into the homes of millions every week (along with Nellie Olesen, the quintessential mean girl).  It's quite a legacy.

Please join me in some Little House nostalgia, as I reminisce about maple syrup candy and falling asleep to the sound of fiddle playing--what are some of your favorite Little House moments? --Seira

The nine books in the Little House series:

10. Favorite Little House Moments

Whenever I hear the name Laura Ingalls Wilder, or even just think it, a warm homey feeling comes over me like being covered in my grandma's quilt.  Today I'm getting that feeling a lot, since February 7th is Laura Ingalls Wilder's birthday (born in 1867) and she is very much on my mind.

It's been said that Wilder wrote the Little House books to preserve the stories of her childhood for today's children, to help them to understand how much America had changed during her lifetime.  Thanks to her foresight, generations of children have vicariously lived the pioneer experience and gained an appreciation of the difficulties the early homesteaders faced in a way that no history book or adult recitation of "how good we have it" could ever accomplish.

The Little House books have also given readers an opportunity to bond across generations, when the books are lovingly passed along from a parent or grandparent who fell in love with the series during their own childhood. Personally, I read my mother's set--which didn't include The First Four Years, discovered many years after Wilder's death--with their odd square shape and cloth covers, purchased during a time when the author was still alive (Wilder died in 1957 at the age of 90). I have warm memories of reading those old books, pretending I was living in the Ingalls cabin alongside Laura and Mary, and I can't wait to share the series with my own daughter.  Reading even a fraction of the hundreds of customer reviews tells me that the Little House bond is shared by many, and one of the beautiful things about these books is that they are loved by boys and girls alike.

Wilder was 65 in 1932 when her first book, Little House in the Big Woods, was published and her books have remained in print ever since.   In 1954 the American Library Association founded the Laura Ingalls Wilder Award, the first one given to its namesake, and now awarded every two years to "an author or illustrator whose books, published in the United States, have made, over a period of years, a substantial and lasting contribution to literature for children." The current winner is Tomie dePaola, who received the award in 2011.  Besides the children's book award, there are museums, elementary schools (including one in my hometown), countless books, blogs, and websites--even a crater on Venus named for Laura Ingalls Wilder. And then, of course, there was the wildly popular television show that brought Laura, most notably in the form of Melissa Gilbert, into the homes of millions every week (along with Nellie Olesen, the quintessential mean girl).  It's quite a legacy.

Please join me in some Little House nostalgia, as I reminisce about maple syrup candy and falling asleep to the sound of fiddle playing--what are some of your favorite Little House moments? --Seira

The nine books in the Little House series:

11. May B.'s Hornbook Review


May B.
by Caroline Starr Rose
Intermediate, Middle School    Schwartz & Wade/Random    233 pp.
nov2011coverdraft sm Preview January/February 2012 <i>Horn Book Magazine</i>
The verse novel form is particularly well suited to this spare survival story set on the homesteaded Kansas prairie. In late August, young May’s parents send her off to work for a newly married couple on their isolated farm fifteen miles away, promising she’ll be back by Christmas. But when the homesick Mrs. Oblinger runs away and her husband sets off to retrieve her and doesn’t return, May is stranded alone in their sod hut, snowed in, unable to get home, unable to send for help.

Dwindling supplies of food and fuel, evidence of wolves, and a blizzard are the external threats that make up the tense plot, but equally dangerous are the psychological challenges of claustrophobia and despair. Only when May chooses to live fully in the present can she gather her resources for a life-saving plan. A backstory involving May’s dyslexia parallels the themes of abandonment and potent effects of small, rare kindnesses. Author Rose uses a close-up lens and a fine sense of rhythm to draw us into her stark world, Little House on the Prairie without the coziness. “It’s the noise that wakes me / in the darkness close as a shroud. / Wind whips around the soddy; / I imagine I hear the walls groan.” sarah ellis

9 Comments on May B.'s Hornbook Review, last added: 12/12/2011
Display Comments Add a Comment
12. AILC reader on McClure's THE WILDER LIFE

Editor's Note: Today's post is by a Teacher Librarian, NW of Chicago. She writes:

I have spent a long time pondering your comments about the Laura Ingalls Wilder books because, as you can guess, I loved the books when I read them as a child. However, something happened that put everything in perspective for me. I recently listened to the audio book, The Wilder Life: my adventures in the lost world of Little House on the Prairie, written by Wendy McClure. It is a memoir recording her year of visiting all the places Laura had lived and how she felt about the experience. As a Little House fan, I was riveted. I thought that throughout the book, McClure did an adequate job of pointing out Wilder's prejudices when writing about the Indians. However, toward the end of her book, McClure wrote of this incident:
p. 318

I bought a sunbonnet at the museum store, my sixth one.

"I had a feeling you would buy one on this trip," Kara said, as we walked back out to the car. "I bought something, too." She went through her bag in the backseat and pulled out a feathered headband, the kind they used to sell in dime stores for playing cowboys and Indians. "Picture time!" she said.

I started laughing. "Oh my God," I said. "Yes!" We put on our mythical headgear and took pictures of ourselves standing together in the parking lot. It seemed a fitting way to end the trip.
In my mind, the incident was a totally "unfitting" way to end the book. This scene ruined my empathetic feelings toward the author and illustrated how Wilder's stereotypes are still alive and well.

1 Comments on AILC reader on McClure's THE WILDER LIFE, last added: 7/22/2011
Display Comments Add a Comment
13. "Indians in the House" episode of LHOP TV show---deleted or not?!

Many of you may know that I've written about the "Indians in the House" scene of Little House on the Prairie. I don't think I've yet shared what is called a "deleted scene" from the pilot for the television series. Here's the specific segment. It is rather ominous in music and action of the Indians... 

In the book, Laura and Mary are definitely afraid for Ma and Carrie, but the TV segment is especially scary. I don't know if it was cut or not. Comments on the Youtube site say it wasn't. 


0 Comments on "Indians in the House" episode of LHOP TV show---deleted or not?! as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
14. Anita Silvey recommends LITTLE HOUSE IN THE BIG WOODS

Yesterday (July 10, 2011) at "Children's Book-A-Day Almanac," Anita Silvey featured Laura Ingalls Wilder's Little House in the Big Woods. She writes that the Little House books "remain one of the best-loved stories of childhood."


Best loved story for whom?

Are they "the best-loved stories of childhood" for everyone? Little Town on the Prairie has Pa in blackface. Dawn Friedman addresses it in her post "Pa in Blackface: Confronting racism in our children's books." I don't think everyone would look on this as a "best loved" story. Would you, for example, knowing it has blackface in it, call it one of your best loved stories?

Same thing with Little House in the Big Woods. On page 53, Pa regales Laura and Mary with his days of youth when he'd pretend he was "a mighty hunter, stalking the wild animals and the Indians." Here's the passage where he said that: 

When I was a little boy, not much bigger than Mary, I had to go every afternoon to find the cows in the woods and drive them home. My father told me never to play by the way, but to hurry and bring the cows home before dark, because there were bears and wolves and panthers in the woods.    

One day I started earlier than usual, so I thought I did not need to hurry. There were so many things to see in the woods that I forgot that dark was coming. There were red squirrels in the trees, chipmunks scurrying through the leaves, and little rabbits playing games together  in the open places. Little rabbits, you know, always have games together before they go to bed.    

I began to play I was a mighty hunter, stalking the wild animals and the Indians. I played I was fighting the Indians, until all woods seemed full of wild men, and then all at once I heard the birds twittering 'good night.'
 
Would you call a book in which the characters romanticize hunting people one of your "best loved" stories?

And of course, there are multiple problems with Little House on the Prairie. (Scroll down to the "labels" section of AICL and you'll see that I've written about the book several times.)

There is no disputing the love and adoration readers shower on the series, but it is a blind love and a blind adoration that has ramifications for all of us. Thinking of a people as "wild" makes it easier to hunt and kill them. I'm thinking the uncritical embrace of these books is akin to planting seeds that will get watered later when someone deems it in America's best interests to go to war...  

I wish that Silvey would take a moment to give her readers a critical view of the Little House series. In her post about Julius Lester, she writes that Lester and Pinkney's Sam and the Tigers removed "the racial sting" associated with Little Black Sambo. "Racial sting" is a mild way to reference racist stereotypes, but she did acknowledge the problems with LBS. I wish she could do the same with LHOP.

6 Comments on Anita Silvey recommends LITTLE HOUSE IN THE BIG WOODS, last added: 7/12/2011
Display Comments Add a Comment
15. Fusenews: Woah Nellie!

Lightning quiz Fusenews today, folks! 

It is one thing to play Nellie Oleson, the much loathed villain of the Laura Ingalls Wilder books, in a television show.  It is another thing entirely to write a book about the experience.  And certainly I would not have know that such an event had taken place were it not for Peter’s post on Collecting Children’s Books.  And that’s not even including the news about the children’s author that’s showing up in a soap opera!  Alas, you’ll have to read Peter’s post to see who it is for yourself.

  • Quiz question, beauties.  Do you work in a county library that serves a population under 16,000 or a town library that  serves a population under 10,000?  Is your library in a rural area, with a limited operating budget, and an active children’s department?  And is your budget for books a bit diminished these days?  Want some free children’s books?  Then now would be the time to apply for this grant from The Libri Foundation.  I kid not.  Read through the rules, see if you fit, and apply before August 15th for a grant that will help you and your kids out.  And I am much obliged to Dawn Mundy for the link.
  • You know what author I like?  I like Peter Dickinson.  He’s one of those blokes I’ve resigned myself to never ever meeting due to the fact that he is, y’know… British.  But if you had told me that he was still up for doing online interviews I would have scoffed and huffed and generally made a fool of myself.  That said, Scribble City Central has a simply lovely talk with the man up and running right now.  And if you don’t know your Dickinson, I advise you to go out and read Eva or The Seventh Raven right now.  Particularly The Seventh Raven.  Best school play meets hostage situation book for kids I’ve ever read.
  • It’s not every day that children’s literature is so heavily featured on NPR, but Monica Edinger, Esme Raji Codell, and Peter Cowden have offered up their picks for summer reading on the show On Point with Richard Ashbrook.  Good choices to be found there.
  • To be frank, when I heard that Louis Sachar had written a book for kids about the game of bridge, my first instinct was to think, “What next?  Golf?”  I still pretty much feel that way, even after having read Leila’s review of his book The Cardturner over at bookshelves of doom.  But at least I feel a little less weird about the fact that it even exists at all.
  • Woah!  Woah-we-woah-woah-hold-on-there-woah!  Have you read the Oz and Ends piece on the new Indian edition of Mitali Perkins’ First Daughter: Extreme American Makeover?  Definitely the strangest bit of news in the course of all our whitewashing controversies.  Heavens above!
  • Daily Image:

What do you get the Percy Jackson fan who

8 Comments on Fusenews: Woah Nellie!, last added: 7/6/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
16. Following up on "What Laura Ingalls Wilder left out of LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE"

On July 3, 2008, my blog post was "Selective Omissions, or, What Laura Ingalls Wilder left out of LITTLE HOUSE."  In a nutshell, it was about a speech she gave wherein she said some things were not appropriate reading for young children, so, she left them out of her book. The example she gave was of a family named the Benders. She said they were murderers, that many bodies were found on their property, and that Pa had joined a group of men from town to go find them. 

Soon after I uploaded that post, I got comments saying that Laura and her family were not actually living in Indian Territory when that whole incident with the Benders took place.

I suggest you go to that post and read it, and then come back here and continue reading...

A few days ago, I was reading a blog called Condensery, specifically the post titled "Laura Ingalls Wilder and the Bloody Benders." There, I learned that Rose (Laura's daughter) had actually written up that Bender story and included it in Pioneer Girl, which was the unpublished memoir of Laura's life, co-written by Laura and her daughter. The Pioneer Girl website says that the hand-written manuscript is not available for viewing or study, but that it is available via microfilm. Here's an excerpt, from the blog from laura ingalls wilder to cyberbessie linked to from Condensery.

One night just about sundown a strange man came riding his horse up to the door on a run. Pa hurried out and they talked a few minutes. Then the man went away as fast as he had come, and pa came into the house in a hurry. He would not wait for supper, but asked Ma to give him a bite to eat right away, saying he must go. Something horrible had happened at Benders.

Ma put bread, meat, and some of those good pickles on the table, and Pa talked while he ate. Mary and I hung at the table's edge, looking at the pickles. I heard Pa say "dead," and thought somebody at benders was dead. Pa said, "Already twenty or more, in the cellar." He said, "Benders-- where I stopped for a drink. She asked me to come in."

Ma said, "Oh Charles, thank God!"

I did not understand and felt confused. Mary kept asking Ma why she thanked God, and Ma did not answer... Then Pa said, "They found a little girl, no bigger than Laura. They'd thrown her in on top of her father and mother and tramped the ground down on them, while the little girl was still alive."

I screamed, and Ma told Pa he should have known better.

I'd really like to see the original manuscript! Laura, in her speech, said she left out the whole Bender story because it wasn't fit for children. Did Rose put it in? And then what... Was it cut at the publishing house? Details are a little (or a lot) murky...  Made all the murkier because the Ingalls family wasn't even in that area when the Bender family murderers were exposed! 


The ins and outs of the LITTLE HOUSE saga....  There's always more to learn. I'm glad to have come upon Condensery's blog and this post in particular.



1 Comments on Following up on "What Laura Ingalls Wilder left out of LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE", last added: 4/21/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
17. Pa (as a kid) played that he was hunting Indians

Little House in the Big Woods, by Laura Ingalls Wilder, is Favorite Book #23 in Elizabeth Bird's SLJ "Top 100 Novels" countdown. Published in 1932, Bird says "As of right now, it has sold about sixty million copies in thirty-three languages."

Sixty million! That's a lot of people reading these words in "The Story of Pa and the Voice in the Woods" that begins on page 53:

"When I was a little boy, not much bigger than Mary, I had to go every afternoon to find the cows in the woods and drive them home. My father told me never to play by the way, but to hurry and bring the cows home before dark, because there were bears and wolves and panthers in the woods.    

"One day I started earlier than usual, so I thought I did not need to hurry. There were so many things to see in the woods that I forgot that dark was coming. There were red squirrels in the trees, chipmunks scurrying through the leaves, and little rabbits playing games together  in the open places. Little rabbits, you know, always have games together before they go to bed.    

"I began to play I was a mighty hunter, stalking the wild animals and the Indians. I played I was fighting the Indians, until all woods seemed full of wild men, and then all at once I heard the birds twittering 'good night.' It was dusky in the path, and dark in the woods.

There is no further mention of Indians as Pa continues his story. (The voice he heard was actually an owl.)

It is that last paragraph above that gives me pause. Wilder writes "I began to play I was a mighty hunter, stalking the wild animals and the Indians." Indians who she then calls "wild men." Wilder tells us this story, presumably a story her Pa told to her... A story wherein Pa tells her how he imagined himself, as a kid, hunting Indians. Hunting Indians. 

Pa (the adult) told Laura (the child) and Laura (the writer) told children that Indians are like animals to be hunted.

Did that paragraph leap out at you as you read the book?

When you read the book to children now, what do you do with that passage?

6 Comments on Pa (as a kid) played that he was hunting Indians, last added: 3/21/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
18. Odds and Bookends: January 29

An Interesting Approach to Exciting Youngsters About Reading
What better way to get kids interested in reading than to make them the star of their very own personalized book?

Mixtape: 10 Songs About Libraries and Librarians
Check out these fun songs about libraries and librarians, including artists such as Frank Zappa and Green Day. You can even listen in to discover why these songs made the list.

Little House on the Prairie Continues to Wow Audiences
Everyone’s beloved story is back with a new musical twist. Be sure to check out this new musical, based on Laura Ingalls Wilder’s treasured classic storyline.

Baby-Sitters Club: Life After 30!
The acclaimed teenage gang gets a new twist as we ask the question: Where are they now? From Kristy Thomas to Stacey McGill, these projections will certainly bring back cherished memories.

The Caldecott, Newbery and Printz book awards go to…
John Pinkney’s exceptional illustrations were awarded the Caldecott Medal for capturing the true spirit of a classic fable. The Newbery Medal as well as the Printz Award were also given to some special talent for excellence in both children’s literature and young adult literature.

Books to Film: Martin Scorsese Continues the Trend
With the release of some truly spectacular new films based on classic children’s books, Brian Selznick’s “The Invention of Hugo Cabret” appears to be next in line.

Add a Comment
19. Timeless Thursday: Little House On The Prairie Series

laura_ingalls_wilderI love Timeless Thursdays and not just because it is almost Friday. I love revisiting these books that I read when I was younger and that children or teens are still reading today. And how about this series that I thought about while perusing the shelves of the local library? Timeless Thursday is talking Little House on the Prairie books by Laura Ingalls Wilder pictured here.

Of course, when I was little, Laura Ingalls Wilder was actually Melissa Gilbert, and Pa was Michael Landon. I couldn’t wait to tune into the television show and see what Mary, Carrie, Albert, Laura, Ma and Pa were doing. I even wanted to see Nellie and mean old Mrs. Olsen. Oh, I loved that show.

Then I discovered the books, and there are so many of them. Here are the titles of the Little House on the Prairie series:
Little House in the Big Woods
Farmer Boy
Little House on the Prairie
On the Banks of Plum Creek
Old Town in the Green Groves
By the Shores of Silver Lake
The Long Winter
Little Town on the Prairie
These Happy Golden Years
The First Four Years

And a website where you can find fun and games and notes for teachers about Little House books.

What makes us love these books so much? I’ve decided it has to be the characters. We love the Ingalls and the people they come into contact with. We love hearing how they struggle, celebrate, survive, and live as a family. These are character-driven novels, and they are some of the best for kids–especially if you want them to learn about this period in history.

Do you have a favorite Little House book? If so, please share with us and tell us why.

Add a Comment
20. Edit(s) to 1935 edition of LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE?


While doing research on Syd Hoff's Danny and the Dinosaur, I came across information about a revision to Laura Ingalls Wilder's Little House on the Prairie. When it was first published in 1935 by Harper, the illustrations were done by Helen Sewell. I knew the publisher asked Garth Williams to redo illustrations for the book in the 1950s, but I did not know text had also been changed.

In Dear Genius: The Letters of Ursula Nordstrom, is the following letter. Nordstrom was the editorial director at Harper from 1940 to 1973, and she was Wilder's editor. The letter writer's name is not provided in Dear Genius. Here is Nordstrom's response (page 53 and 54)

October 14, 1952
Dear _____
Your letter to Mrs. [Laura Ingalls] Wilder, the author of Little House on the Prairie, came several weeks ago. We took the liberty of opening it as we do many of the letters that are addressed to Mrs. Wilder. Often we can send the writers the photographs and biographical material they want. Mrs. Wilder is now in her eighties and we try to handle much of the correspondence here.

We are indeed disturbed by your letter. We knew that Mrs. Wilder had not meant to imply that Indians were not people and we did not want to distress her if we could possibly avoid it. I must admit to you that no one here realized that those words read as they did. Reading them now it seems unbelievable to me that you are the only person who has picked them up and written to us about them in the twenty years since the book was published. We were particularly disturbed because all of us here feel just as strongly as you apparently feel about such subjects, and we are proud that many of the books on the Harper list prove that. Perhaps it is a hopeful sign that though such a statement could have passed unquestioned twenty years ago it would never have appeared in anything published in recent years.

Instead of forwarding your letter to Mrs. Wilder I wrote her about the passage and said that in reprinting we hoped that she would allow us to change it. I have just received her answer. She says: "You are perfectly right about the fault in Little House on the Prairie and have my permission to make the correction you suggest. It was a stupid blunder of mine. Of course Indians are people and I did not intend to imply they were not." We are changing the next printing to read "There were no settlers."*

We appreciate your letter, but we are terribly sorry that ___ could not have the book for her eighth birthday. The new printing will be available for her ninth one though, and we are making a note now to be sure that you receive a complimentary copy. As a children's book editor, I was touched by your not wanting ___ to know only the Saggy, Baggy Elephant and I was therefore all the more upset by your very reasonable complaint against Mrs. Wilder's book.

I am sorry this is not a better letter and I am particularly sorry that I have not written you long before this. I wanted to wait, though, until I had written Mrs. Wilder and received her answer.

The asterisk above is actually a numeral one in Dear Genius but I can't do footnote numbering in Blogger so used an asterisk instead. That asterisk corresponds to a note at the bottom of the page that says

The passage in question appears in the opening chapter. As revised it reads as follows: "There the wild animals wandered and fed as though they were in a pasture that stretched much farther than a man could see, a

14 Comments on Edit(s) to 1935 edition of LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE?, last added: 11/3/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
21. an eye on carrie


Lately, I've been watching a lot of Little House episodes in preparation for my interview with Sidney Greenbush. Though I've seen most of them before, this time around I've been keeping a careful eye on Carrie. There are a lot of charming scenes of her at the table, or mimicking grown-ups. And have you ever noticed the twins' big, beautiful blue eyes?

I'm having fun trying to see if I can tell the twins apart. As they got a little older, Sidney is recognizable by a space between her front teeth. Their facial expressions are a little different, too. Lindsay's face is longer, more angular, Sidney's rounder and fuller.

I watched an interview with Alison Arngrim (who played Nellie Oleson) last night. Like me, she always wondered why Carrie was treated as "Baby Carrie," even when she was 10 or 11. She definitely should have gotten more speaking parts as one of Laura's siblings, and more storylines written for her.

Thought you might like to watch the beginning of the only episode that features both twins, "The Godsister." Apparently, this is the only time they argued over who would play which scenes. Both wanted to be Elissa, Carrie's imaginary friend, so in the end, they shared both roles. "The Godsister" is Sidney's favorite episode. I'm embedding Part One, so you can see her famous opening sequence, and Part Two, which shows Carrie meeting Elissa for the first time. The rest of the episode is on YouTube (7 parts total).




Add a Comment
22. calling all Little House fans!



        
       Marin and Debbie.

A really really cool thing happened recently.

See my great-niece, Marin, up there? She just turned six and received this lovable doll, "Debbie," for her birthday. But Debbie isn't just any doll. Debbie has a very interesting history. Here's the scoop:

A couple of years ago, Marin's mom started reading the Little House books to her. She loved the stories and was hooked instantly, listening intently every night along with her older brothers, Harrison and Logan. She was thrilled to receive her very own set of Little House books for Christmas, and has basically been wild about all things Laura Ingalls Wilder ever since, even dressing up like Laura with little black boots and wearing her hair in pigtails.

Marin also loves the TV series on DVD -- she, Harrison and Logan like to gather in the family room and cuddle under warm blankets while watching the show. Well, it just so happens that Marin's dad, Ian, knows Lindsay and Sidney Greenbush, the identical twins who played the part of Carrie.


My guess: Sidney on the left, Lindsay on the right?

This is what Ian said about what happened next:

Marin was very impressed to know that I went to school with Carrie. Since watching the show, she'd really started to identify with the characters. In one episode, Marin saw a doll that Carrie was clinging to. She thought it was cute that Carrie was holding her dolly -- and playing with the doll in another episode. When I told her Sidney was sending a special surprise in the mail for her birthday, she couldn't wait. She asked daily when it would arrive.



When it did, she tore into it and was shocked to see two dolls. Sidney's doll, "Debbie," from the show, and a little "Carrie" doll that was brand new. She squealed with delight, and slept with the dolls near her.





Debbie now sits on the mantlepiece in the living room for now, until a more suitable home can be found to "preserve" her in, but Sidney placed an incredibly sweet inscription on the doll for Marin. It reads:

"To Marin, the best friend that Carrie ever had. Happy Birthday! - Sidney Robyn Greenbush."


If you look closely, you can see Sidney's inscription on Debbie's back.

Talk about a little girl's dream coming true!

But there's more!!



Of course, I'm also a big Little House fan, as are most of you. In fact, I own the complete DVD set of all 9 seasons, and never get tired of watching my favorite episodes. It's just one of the most beloved, timeless family television shows ever -- I feel like I know all the characters so well, and would love to be in Miss Beadle's class and sit at the Ingalls' family table.

So I got to thinking -- would it be possible to get to know one of the twins who played "Carrie" a little better? Thanks to Ian (who, BTW, is also a twin), I emailed Sidney Greenbush, and she has graciously agreed to stop by for an interview!! *flips out with excitement*


Debbie actually replaced this doll, which got worn from use. Apparently, Debbie is   quite camera shy, as we couldn't find a photo of her with Carrie.

And, I want you, my blog readers, to share this rare opportunity with me. Rather than thinking up a bunch of questions on my own, I want to give you the chance to ask Sidney whatever you'd like about the show. Keep in mind, she and Lindsay were three when they were first cast for the pilot in the summer of 1973, and went on to appear in 8 seasons.

So, if you're a fan of the show, here's your big chance! Just leave your question in the comments, or email me: readermail (at) jamakimrattigan (dot com). (Please put "Sidney Greenbush" in the subject line.) I'll round these up and forward them to Sidney, and post the interview later in the month.

In case you were wondering, Sidney is the twin who falls in the opening sequence of the show! ☺

Yet another extremely cool and awesome thing: Ian, who produces "Good Day Oregon" on KPTV, Fox 12, just won a 2008 Emmy for the highly popular morning news show! WOOHOO!! Congratulations, Ian!! *beams with industrial strength pride*

*Special thanks to Ian for his remarks and photos of Marin, and thanks to Sidney for the adorable photo of her and Michael Landon.

**Other cast photos posted by permission of
prairiefans.com, copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
 

Add a Comment
23. Native Americans in Little House on the Prairie


After reading the reviews on Little House on the Prairie by Laura Ingalls Wilder on Debbie Reese’s blog and the Oyate organization’s website, I thought it was time for me to revisit the book I loved as a child. Would I agree with them that my daughter should not read this book when we study this time period in American history? Should LHOP be removed from library shelves and schools?

Can I put aside my emotional ties to the book and look at it through new eyes? I set about to thoroughly critique and assess every mention of Indians.

I wasn’t sure if I could. I did read this book over and over and over as a child while knowing that one of the branches of my family tree is Native American. I grew up with remorse in my heart for what had happened to the American Indian in the United States. I am still disgusted at what happens to the American Indian now and I have always taught my children that we should, quite simply, be terribly ashamed of what our European ancestors did to the Native American. There is no way out of that truth. So did my reading of Little House on the Prairie influence me as a child to see the American Indian in a negative light? No.

It did influence me to understand that the Ingalls family was wrong for moving onto Osage land. It does bother me enormously that on the Little House in the Prairie historic site website, they present a shameful mistruth that Pa did not know he was moving onto Osage land. He sure did and the book says he did on page 316. The site goes on to say that it was too bad Pa didn’t know the government was going to remove the Indians six months after he left. He could’ve settled the land.

Little House in the Prairie is set in 1868. Pa, Ma, Mary, Laura and Baby Carrie are moving west out of the Big Woods of Wisconsin because Pa wants to move to Indian country where only Indians live. They pile in their covered wagon and head to Kansas.

Why? Pa thinks it is too crowded in the Big Woods, he wants to be around more wild animals, in the West the land is level, there are no trees and the grass grows thick and high - pasture as far as the eye can see and most importantly, there are no settlers. Pa promises Laura that she will see a papoose - a little, brown Indian baby.

The obstacles begin to be thrown in the Ingalls’s path. God letting them know that they were not in His Will, in my opinion.

Pa crosses a creek where he is only guessing it is the ford and he makes Jack swim, even when Laura asks for the dog to be allowed in the wagon. Pa is not so nice. The creek supposedly rises too fast and they are all nearly lost in the rushing water. Jack the brindle bull dog is gone. Pa says, “What we’ll do in a wild country without a good watchdog I don’t know.”

I think Pa was impulsive and thoughtless — serious character deficiencies. He moves his family of girls to American Indians’ land from a place of family and community, he crosses the creek in the wrong spot and tries to explain it away as a sudden rising and he loses the dog. What the heck was he thinking?

But in one of my still favorite scenes, Jack finds the family and Pa almost shoots him, thinking the dog is a wolf. The family is camping where there is no evidence of anyone living there; they are 40 miles from Independence.

Laura describes the prairie as teeming with life. Enormous blue sky and birds galore. Wild animals and wild flowers and such beauty as she can hardly believe. Every breath she takes seems to take in the abundance of the prairie. And I love how Ma made order in the midst of the wild. She washed the bedding and clothing right in the middle of the wagon; the girls are always clean, hair brushed and done, the meals cooked. Ma’s compulsiveness to Pa’s impulsiveness.

Ma answers Laura’s questions about the Indians on pages 46 to 47. She tells the girls the Indians won’t hurt them but that she just doesn’t like them. She doesn’t want to see them. Laura confronts her, why did their family move there then? Ma says she doesn’t know if they’re in Indian country or not and that the government may have already opened the land to settlement, they don’t know. This seems to fluster Ma and she gets back to housework.

Pa has decided to build the cabin near the Verdigris River, according to the Little House website, this is about 13 miles southwest of Independence. Laura finds an old walking trail.

Pa answers Laura that she would only see an Indian if he wanted her to see him. He had seen Indians in New York as a boy and Laura tells us that she knows the Indians are “wild men with red skins.”

Then we find out how tough Ma is. A big log falls on her as she is helping Pa build their cabin. She sprains her ankle, but wants no fuss over her. In Chapter 6, she asks Pa why they haven’t seen any Indians. He doesn’t know, he’s seen their camp sites, maybe they’re on a hunting trip. They joke together that Ma could wash clothes in the creek like the Indian women do and Ma says they could cut a hole in the roof to let smoke out and have a fire on the floor like the Indians do. Yet, Ma cooks outside. Pa and Ma justify their sins against the Indians by assuming an air of superiority over them.

It is difficult to get an accurate reading as to Pa’s real beliefs about the American Indians. His words often seem to contradict his actions. But sometimes, his actions support his words. Did he think that he could just live among the Indians? What was he really running away from back in Wisconsin? What had he promised Ma behind closed doors about life in Indian Territory?

When Pa goes out riding in Chapter 7, he does not take his gun as they have plenty of meat EVEN THOUGH he knows the Indians are nearby and they may be in armed hunting parties. Jack acts anxious while Pa is gone and it does not really worry Ma except that she keeps her eyes open. Pa had met other white settlers, some of whom had only seen Indians. On this trip, Pa finds an ill white family and gets them help. He also encounters a pack of fifty wolves, and the wolves do not attack him. Furthermore, Pa does not shoot any of the wolves after he makes it back home and the wolves have circled the cabin. Pa is an unusual man for his time. Often in literature, wolves are depicted as monster-like animals that attack and kill and must be killed. Who is this Pa really that he would ride around without a gun and not shoot any of those wolves around his cabin?

Pa locks the stable, “Where there are deer, there will be wolves, and where there are horses, there will be horse-thieves.” But the family still hasn’t seen any Indians and the Indian camps in the bluffs are deserted. Ma says Laura yells like an Indian and is getting as brown as one, Mary and Pa also and she doesn’t understand why Laura still wants to see an Indian. Laura is tired of waiting to see them.

Finally, in Chapter 11 we meet the Indians. Pa goes hunting and Jack is chained to the stable. The girls are told not to let him loose. The girls stay by Jack. He growls. Two “naked, wild men” are coming down the Indian trail. They are “tall, thin, fierce-looking”, “brownish-red”, have a “tuft of hair”, their eyes are black and glittering like snake eyes, “terrible men” Laura says. The girls are frightened.

And here we have writing at its finest. One of the most difficult tasks a writer faces is to stay true to the voice of the character. Wilder uses the voice of a six-year-old white girl raised by her parents to view American Indians as dangerous. Would she describe them any other way? They were dangerous if you were somewhere you shouldn’t have been.

And that is the crux of the underlying tone of this book, in my opinion. The Ingalls family knew they were doing something wrong and the entire story is flavored in a dichotomous justification and sense of guilt for that wrong.

The Indians go in the house with Ma and baby Carrie and Laura faces her fears and goes in the house. There is a “horribly bad smell” from the skunk skins they wear on their leather thongs and Wilder gives a detailed description of their appearance. She does overuse “black glittering eyes” but I found over usage with other phrases. Remember she could not click on find on a word processor. Or I should say, her daughter Rose could not.

The Indians eat Ma’s cornbread that she serves them, they take all Pa’s tobacco, but they DO NOT harm the family. This is an important point to make. Throughout the story, the Indians never once harm the white family nor any other white families the Ingalls’ know. Doesn’t this contradict what Ma and Laura had expected? Does it contradict what happens in so many other stories about American Indians written in 1935? I know that Dwight Eisenhower often read pulp Westerns to relax. How did those depict American Indians? Could Laura and Rose have been forward thinking? I would appreciate hearing about any exhaustive reviews of the depiction of Native Americans in literature at the time LHOP was written.

And what about that these Indians did not know enough to prepare the skunk skins correctly? A quote from Laura, “Persons appear to us according to the light we throw upon them from our own mind.” Whether the depictions of two Indians lacking in a particular skill are cast from Laura’s mind or her daughter Rose’s, (as she put the finishing touches on Laura’s narrative) we will never know. The depiction does bring to the reader’s mind the sharp differences between the Native culture and the European culture. The inaccuracy, as it appears, is unfortunate in a book published in 1935. Just fifteen years after women won the right to vote and three decades before the civil rights movement. I could not locate any sources as to whether or not the Osage Indians even wore skunk skins.

An inaccuracy of this magnitude is inexcusable in contemporary children’s literature.

Pa gets very angry with the girls when he finds out they considered loosening Jack. “Bad trouble” would’ve happened “And that’s not all.”

Pa makes a locked cupboard to protect their food stores and then he goes on to save a neighbor from death due to gas poisoning at the bottom of the Ingalls’ water well, despite Ma’s protests, and the risk to his own life. So, Pa is like all of us. Sometimes he commits heroic acts and sometimes, based upon his personal beliefs, he does not.

In the “Indian Camp”, Chapter 14, Pa wonders where the Indians have gone, and he takes the girls to see their camp in the heat of summer. Along the way, he stops Jack from killing rabbits as they have enough meat already. Pa reads the tracks at the camp and the girls collect pretty glass beads. Pa did NOT take his gun.

In chapter 15, Laura meets an African-American man for the first time in her life and she describes all of his differences in as much detail as she did with the Indians. Dr. Tan was on his way to Independence, from doctoring the Osage, when he came upon Pa’s house and finds the family sickened with malaria. Jack begged him to come in. He stays for one and half days until Mrs. Scott, the neighbor comes to care for them.

In the next chapter, the chimney catches fire while Pa is hunting. Laura pulls Mary and Carrie in a rocking chair away from the fire. Looks like they are having a lot of problems living on Osage land. Wilder was a lifelong Christian and relaying the extent of their many problems while living where they shouldn’t have been was a conscious decision. Yes, they face tragedies in the other books, but Laura left the two years out of her books when her little brother died. She chose which problems to relay to the reader.

When Pa goes to town for four days, and this length of travel is consistently relayed throughout (including when they left for good), Mrs. Scott comes to visit with Ma. And while Laura is grateful to Mrs. Scott for nursing her and her family, she obviously doesn’t like her.

Mrs. Scott is a racist bigot. She rails against the Indians. She worries about trouble with them, as she should. The Indians would never do anything with the land except to roam around like wild animals - the land belongs to folks that’ll farm it - despite the treaties - that’s common sense and justice. Mrs. Scott goes on to say, “The only good Indian was a dead Indian.” The thought of them makes her blood run cold and she starts to recall the Minnesota massacre but Ma stops her. The Minnesota massacre occurred in 1862.

Mr. Edwards stops by and warns Ma that Indians are camping in the shelter of the bluffs and he offers to stay overnight in the stable. But, Ma is a toughie and she sends Edwards home. Laura worries about Pa crossing the creek bottoms where the “wild men” are.

It rains during this trip for Pa and on the way home, he must continuously break the frozen mud out of the wagon wheel spokes. The terrible wind slows the horses. Pa comes home though with eight squares of window glass in perfect condition.

In Chapter 18, “The Tall Indian”, Indians ride by the house on the path — straight and tall, black eyes glittering, “scalplocks wound with colored string”. Pa wouldn’t have built the house so close to a well-traveled road, if he’d known. Another thoughtless mistake. Jack hates Indians and Ma doesn’t blame him, “Indians are getting so thick around here that I can’t look up without seeing one!” she claims. An Indian stands in the doorway and says, “How!” They hadn’t heard him approach. “They couldn’t take their eyes from that Indian. He was so still that the beautiful eagle-feathers in his scalplock didn’t stir. Only his bare chest and the leanness under his ribs moved to his breathing. He wore fringed leather leggings, and his moccasins were covered with beads.” This is the man the story later identifies as Soldat du Chêne, and he is dressed in his culture’s attire.

Pa and the man squat by the fire and Ma serves them dinner. Pa gives him tobacco for his pipe but he cannot understand him. He guesses the Indian is Osage, that he spoke French and he says he was not “common trash”. Ma wishes everyone would keep to themselves and Pa says not to worry, they are friendly. Pa seems to continuously defend them throughout the story.

Months later while Pa is out hunting and trapping, two dirty scowling, mean Indians come to the house, take all the cornbread, the tobacco and Pa’s bundle of furs for trade. One of the Indians makes the other one drop the fur bundle and leave it. Pa says, “All is well that ended well.” Laura asks where the Indians go and her parents tell her that Indians go west because the government makes them. On page 237, Pa says, “When white settlers come into a country, the Indians have to move on. The government is going to move these Indians farther west, any time now. That’s why we’re here, Laura. White people are going to settle this country, and we get the best land because we get here first and take our pick. Now do you understand?” Laura answers yes, but …

I think this story was Laura’s attempts to try and come to that understanding. Why did Pa move them there? Wasn’t it wrong even when all the other white people said it wasn’t? Children are different about assessing right and wrong. It isn’t as easy for them to justify greed and moral injustice. How do we in the 21st century grapple with what our white ancestors did to settle the land we know now as the United States?

Pa has a scary but harmless encounter with a panther. This whole place he has moved them to is dangerous. They almost don’t get any presents from Santa Claus because it is so dangerous - the creek is roaring with rushing water and no one can cross it.

In Chapter 21, “Indian Jamboree”, Pa is gone again for five days taking his fur trade to Independence. The Indians are making a lot of noise, something like an ax chopping, dog barking and a wild and fierce song (but not angry) and it gets louder and louder and faster and it frightens them. Pa returns with goods from town and he tells Ma that the Indians have been complaining to Washington and the white settlers will have to leave Indian territory. But Pa doesn’t believe it; they always make the Indians leave. Even the newspaper says the territory will open soon to settlers. Pa has a very good understanding of the government’s treatment of the American Indian. General William H. Harrison barged his way onto Treaty secured Shawnee land and wiped out the Prophet’s Town in 1811.

In the “Prairie Fire”, Chapter 22, Indians are everywhere now, some friendly, some surly and cross, and the Ingalls give them what they want. Pa and Ma must fight a raging prairie fire with wet sacks and a controlled fire in a furrow. It is a harrowing experience. The fire never reached the Indian camps and Mr. Edwards and Mr. Scott stop by after and raise suspicions the Indians set the fire. Pa doesn’t believe it; the Indians set fires to make the green grass grow and travel easier.

Mr. Edwards doesn’t like all the Indians. Mr. Scott says they’re coming together in the jamboree means “devilment”. “The only good Indian is a dead Indian,” says Mr. Scott. Pa says, “He didn’t know about that. He figured the Indians would be as peaceable as anybody else if let alone. They had moved west so many times that naturally they hated white folks. But an Indian ought to have sense to know when he was licked.” The soldiers at nearby forts will stop any trouble and the Indians are really congregating for the big spring buffalo hunt. Half a dozen tribes who often fought each other were making peace for the hunt. “It’s not likely they’ll start on the warpath against us.”

On page 285, Mr. Scott responded to Pa, “Well, maybe you’re right about it, Ingalls.” He’ll be glad to tell Mrs. Scott what Pa said as she can’t stop thinking about the Minnesota massacre.

Isn’t Pa full of contradictions?

More and more Indians begin to congregate in Chapter 23, “Indian War-Cry”, and the Ingalls hide inside as they hear the “savage” voices shouting. Pa makes a bunch of bullets. Indians stop coming to the house. The prairie feels unsafe, queer, and as if something is watching Laura now. But Laura had already imparted a feeling of danger to us throughout the story. Is everything coming to a head? Laura is afraid of the Indians and Pa spends every waking second with his gun out the window, watching. Pa tells her, “Don’t be afraid” but the warrior yells are worse than wolves howling.

The Osage who spoke French goes galloping by on a black pony during this nightmarish five nights of “wild, fast yipping yells” and days of silence. Ma hopes that the Indians will fight each other. Then, it is over. The Indians split apart and begin to leave. After it is quiet for two nights, Pa takes his gun and scouts along the creek. All the Indians except the Osage have left.

On page 300, Pa meets an Osage in the woods and the Osage tells Pa that all the Indians except the Osage wanted to kill the whites who were on Indian lands. But Soldat du Chêne, the man on the black pony, stopped them. He told the other tribes that the Osage would kill them if they attacked the whites. The other tribes didn’t dare fight the Osage. “That’s one good Indian!” Pa says. He adds that he didn’t believe the only good Indian was a dead one.

Laura invented the character of Soldat du Chêne. He was a contemporary of Tecumseh’s, his portrait done in 1805/1806.

Stephanie Vavra has written a booklet on who really was the Osage Indian that Laura had met:

http://www.amazon.com/Who-Really-Saved-Laura-Ingalls/dp/0971278504

The Indian that stopped the other Indians from attacking and killing white settlers was a good Indian. Much as Tecumseh is credited with stopping massacres of captives in battles the Shawnee won. Tecumseh felt the red men would never grow as a nation of stature if they continued to kill men, women and children captured in war. The people who followed Tecumseh admired and respected this change in approach.

Killing women and children and defenseless men no matter their ethnicity or race or religion is wrong. Even George Armstrong Custer knew this. It is what makes the story of what happened to the native peoples of America so horrific.

In Chapter 24, “Indians Ride Away”, Pa strikes Jack for the first time ever when he growls at Soldat as the Osage passes by the little house on the prairie, dressed the same but wrapped in a blanket. Pa salutes Soldat, the Osage’s face “fierce, still, brown” and “proud”, but Soldat does not acknowledge Pa. “Savage warriors” and “little naked brown Indians” on pretty ponies and all of the people follow Soldat down the trail.

Laura has a “naughty wish” to be an Indian, but “of course she did not really mean it”; she just wanted to be naked, riding on a pony. This uncomfortable scene continues, Laura asks Pa to get her one of those little Indian babies, as if they are objects. Pa reproaches her, but she continues to beg. When Pa tells her the Indian woman wants her baby, Laura cries. Ma says, “Why do you want an Indian baby, of all things!”

But the reader is only left to conjecture what was going on in six-year-old Laura’s mind. My daughter, when younger, sometimes would ask for a baby that she saw. She’d say something like, “Can we get one of those?” Sometimes they were little brown or black or yellow babies and one of her favorite doll babies was an African-American cabbage patch doll. It bothered my racist grandmother enormously when I purchased the doll for my daughter.

On page 311, after many, many Indians went west and they are all gone, Laura writes, “And nothing was left but silence and emptiness. All the world seemed very quiet and lonely.” The family cannot eat and Ma feels “let down”. Pa goes out to plow. Sadness permeates the scene. There is no justification for the white settler’s claims. They got what they wanted but they cannot escape the sin of that greed.

“After the Indians had gone, a great peace had settled on the prairie,” writes Wilder in the next chapter. It seems the family has rectified in their minds what has happened. Everything begins to grow again, it is spring and soon they will live like kings.

And then Mr. Scott and Mr. Edwards pay Pa a visit, bearing disturbing news. On page 316, Pa exclaims, “I’ll not stay here to be taken away by the soldiers like an outlaw! If some blasted politicians in Washington hadn’t sent out word it’d be all right to settle here, I’d never have been three miles over the line into Indian territory.”

And it is for this passage that I believe the book has merit as a supplemental curriculum aid in the study of American history. Somehow, we must explain to our children how this all happened. And Pa explains it in one passage.

Dwight D. Eisenhower writes in his memoir At Ease that one person can change history. That historical events are often an accumulation of small acts done by individuals. Just as the Holocaust could have been prevented if the German citizens, each one on their own, stood up and stopped Hitler, so we can safely say, that Pa’s attitude, and those of Mr. Scott and Mr. Edwards, toward the American Indian, resulted in the Native Americans forced removal from their tribal lands. Each white settler who thought he could plop down on someone else’s land, under the protection of the American government, was guilty. Each white man who voted in Presidents and other leaders who advocated the removal of the American Indian, was guilty.

A good teacher will really explore the entire issue of the Native American’s story using this book. A neglectful teacher will have his/her students read this book and romanticize it.

Pa and Ma and Laura and Mary and Carrie leave their house, with more than they brought, and even the horses are eager to go. Pa tells a captain in Independence about the stranded settlers they saw on their way, ensuring they get help. No one of us is molded incapable of doing both good and evil.

My stories are written from a place of grappling with unanswered questions. I am trying to draw conclusions to issues I’ve faced or issues that disturb me through the working out of the story. I see Wilder attempting this in LHOP, and bringing to it her own opinions, beliefs and feelings.

0 Comments on Native Americans in Little House on the Prairie as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
24. Indigenizing Children's Literature


In 2008, the Journal of Language and Literacy (JoLLE) published an article I wrote. Titled "Indigenizing Children's Literature," it is a critical look at Little House on the Prairie and Thanksgiving Day. The article is one of several published in Volume 4(2), 2008, a special issue devoted to children's literature and literacy. JoLLE is a peer-reviewed online journal. I submitted this paper there, specifically because it is an online journal, thereby making it like my blog (accessible to anyone who has an internet connection).

In the conclusion, I make some connections between images and ideology in those two books and America's wartime activity. I welcome your thoughts and comments on the article.

6 Comments on Indigenizing Children's Literature, last added: 2/24/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
25. And the winner is… Kentucky!

We asked you to share the memory of the book that got you hooked, then vote for the state to receive 50,000 new books – and you did!What Book Got You Hooked?

We are excited to annouce the winner of this year’s What Book Got You Hooked? campaign…(drumroll please)… KENTUCKY! In early 2009, First Book will deliver 50,000 new books to programs serving children in need throughout Kentucky.

We were blown away by your response to our question. In fact, more than 250,000 votes were cast to decide the winning state in this year’s What Book Got You Hooked? campaign.  In a race that came down to the wire, West Virginia and Nebraska were out nosed by Kentucky, which cast nearly 94,000 votes.

As for the book that got readers hooked? Nancy Drew solved that case, coming in at #1 in the list of the top 50 titles. The complete list includes childhood classics like Dr. Seuss’ Green Eggs and Ham and Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie as well as modern favorites including the Harry Potter books by J.K. Rowling and Twilight by Stephenie Meyer. The full list of the top 50 books that got Americans hooked on reading can be viewed at www.firstbook.org/whatbook.

Although voting has concluded for our 2008 campaign, you can still make a donation to help provide brand new books to children in need as well as share your favorite books and memories year round!

Add a Comment

View Next 2 Posts