Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.
Blog Posts by Tag
In the past 7 days
Blog Posts by Date
Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Steven Spielberg, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 19 of 19
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: Steven Spielberg in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
Mark Dippé and Steve ‘Spaz’ Williams, who created groundbreaking vfx work on "Jurassic Park," "T2," and "The Abyss," talk about what's different about the vfx industry today.
Mashable reports that Steven Spielbergserved as the director on this project. The video embedded above offers glimpses of Ruby Barnhill as young Sophie and Mark Rylance playing the titular character.
According to The Guardian, other members of the cast include Bill Hader, Rebecca Hall and Jermaine Clement. The theatrical release date has been set for July 01, 2016. (via Rolling Stone)
Universal Pictures has unveiled the final trailer for Jurassic World. The story for this film was inspired by Michael Crichton’s 1990 novel, Jurassic Park. The video embedded above offers glimpses of Chris Pratt as Owen, Bryce Dallas Howard as Claire and swarms of dinosaurs.
Filmmaker Steven Spielberg, the director behind the Jurassic Park and The Lost World movies, served as the executive producer for this project. According to RollingStone.com, it will hit theaters on June 12th. Follow these links to watch the teaser trailer and the global trailer. (via CinemaBlend.com)
Academy Award-nominated actress Viola Davis (pictured, via) has signed on to play abolitionist Harriet Tubman in a biopic. Tubman, who was born into slavery, became well-known for escaping and leading 300 others to freedom through an Underground Railroad.
The story will be based on Kate Clifford Larson’s biography, Bound For The Promised Land. Deadline.com reports that “HBO Films has teamed with writer Kirk Ellis, producer Doug Ellin and Steven Spielberg’s Amblin TV” for this project.
Here’s more from the article: “Cliff Dorfman, who had optioned the book, was a writer on the HBO comedy Entourage, created and executive produced by Ellin, who has a deal with the pay cable network. All key auspices have strong ties to HBO.”
After months of speculation, Scarlett Johansson has been confirmed as the star of DreamWorks's live-action adaptation of Masamune Shirow's manga "Ghost in the Shell."
Ruby Barnhill, a newcomer English actress, will play Sophie in The BFG. This project marks the first time Barnhill will take on a feature part.
Steven Spielberg will take the helm of this Roald Dahl film adaptation as the director. Mark Rylance, a British theatre actor, has been cast in the titular role.
Here’s more from Deadline: “Published in 1982, The BFG is the story of a young London girl and the world’s only benevolent giant who introduces her to the beauty and peril of Giant Country. The two set off on an adventure (with the aid of the Queen of England) to capture the evil, man-eating giants who have been invading the human world. Spielberg is beginning production early in the New Year and Disney releases on July 1, 2016 in the U.S. EOne will bring it to the UK on July 22, 2016.”
Oscar-winning filmmaker Steven Spielberg will direct a live-action adaptation of Roald Dahl’s beloved novel, The BFG.
Variety reports that DreamWorks had acquired the film rights back in 2010. E.T. screenwriter Melissa Mathison will pen the script. The finished movie will be released some time in 2016.
According to an announcement posted on the RoaldDahl.com blog, “The BFG tells the tale of a lovable, dream-hunting giant and Sophie, the little girl who first spots him through the window of the orphanage where she lives. It has continued to delight audiences ever since its release, and was one of Roald’s own favourites. In 1989, the story was adapted as an animated TV film.”
The novel that scared a generation out of the ocean and inspired everything from Shark Week to Sharknado recently turned forty. Commemorations of Peter Benchley’s Jaws have been as rare as megalodon sightings, however. Ballantine has released a new paperback edition featuring an amusing list of the author’s potential titles (The Grinning Fish, Pisces Redux), and in February an LA fundraiser for Shark Savers/Wildaid performed excerpts promising “an evening of relentless terror (and really awkward sex).” Otherwise, silence.
The reason is obvious. Steven Spielberg’s 1975 adaptation is so totemic that the novel is considered glorified source material, despite selling twenty-million copies. Rare is the commentator who doesn’t harp on its faults, and rarer still the fan who defends it. Critics dismiss the book as “airport literature,” while genre lovers complain it lacks “virtually every single thing that makes the movie great.” Negative perceptions arguably begin with Spielberg himself. Amid the legendary production problems that plagued the making of the movie—pneumatic sharks that didn’t work, uncooperative ocean conditions that tripled the shooting schedule—the director managed to suggest that his biggest obstacle was Benchley’s original narrative: “If we don’t succeed in making this picture better than the book,” he said, “we’re in real trouble.”
Jaws by Peter Benchley, first edition paperback, 1975.
It’s unfortunate that Benchley gets so little love. In the mid-seventies book-Jaws didn’t simply inspire a movie but was integral to the overall phenomenon. My mother brought home the hardback months before Spielberg even began filming. As the pre-release hype roiled throughout spring 1975, her ten-year old cobbled together $1.95 for his very own paperback, which featured Roger Kastel’s iconic illustration of a massive beast with a mouthful of stalactites and stalagmites speeding toward a naked woman. (The hardback’s cover was toothless, both literally and figuratively; the shark looks like an index finger with a paper cut aiming to tickle its prey). Shortly after seeing Jaws I owned the soundtrack with John Williams’s ominous dun-dun theme; co-screenwriter Carl Gottlieb’s The Jaws Log, which detailed the torturous filming; and a Jaws beach towel, which made me the envy of the pool, if only briefly.
Obsessed, I collected newspaper and magazine clippings on sharks. Following the loony lead of Mad, Cracked, and Sick, I drew goofy, pun-laden parodies (Paws) and became a connoisseur of gory rip-offs (Grizzly, Orca). My paperback was essential to feeding my frenzy. I managed only three matinees before the movie left town. That was as many times per hour as I probably pored over Benchley’s bloodier passages. The urge to revisit scenes would today send a young fan to YouTube for clips or to Google for GIFs and memes. For a pre-Internet, pre-computer kid, however, rereading was the original refresh and replay. I knew Jaws so inside out I could cite the page number where the legs of the boy my age “were severed at the hips” and “sank, spinning slowly,” and I could flip straight to the bizarre moment when the shark hunter Quint insults his quarry’s penis.
I also detailed differences between the book and movie in my journal. (I was an only child; I had free time). The first change beguiled the beginning writer in me: “[Benchley] didn’t like any of his characters,” Spielberg declared, “so none of them were very likable. He put them in a situation where you were rooting for the shark to eat the people—in alphabetical order.”
The director flattened Benchley’s characters into eminently relatable archetypes: the everyman-cop with a near-fatal fear of water, Martin Brody (Roy Scheider); Quint, the aged fisherman (Robert Shaw); and the cocky scientist, Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss). Their counterparts on the page admittedly lack both their comic relief (Scheider’s famous deadpan “You’re going to need a bigger boat” upon first seeing the shark) and their riveting monologues (especially Quint’s tale of surviving the 1945 sinking of the USS Indianapolis, brilliantly if soddenly delivered by Shaw). Benchley preferred his people perturbing, not heroic. His insecure, snockered Brody belligerently spoils his wife’s dinner party; Hooper beds Mrs. Brody; and for bait Quint uses a dolphin fetus he brags of carving from its mother’s womb.
Despite its armrest-gripping terror, Spielberg’s movie is cathartic because man ultimately conquers nature. Like most audiences, I fist-pumped and cheered when Brody blew the shark to smithereens by exploding an oxygen tank. The book’s battle is less intense and yet more primal. Benchley’s captain hurls his harpoons as Queequeg or Tashtego would instead of firing them from a gun, while Quint’s and Hooper’s deaths are cruelly ironic. Maybe it’s because my friends and I had great fun sneaking ketchup packets into the pool to reenact it, but Shaw’s blood-belching final close-up never haunted me as much as the novel’s Ahab-inspired image of Quint dragged to a watery grave snared in his own harpoon line. Hooper’s fate is even more macabre. As the ichthyologist is turned into a human toothpick Brody attempts an ill-conceived rescue by strafing the water with rifle fire. He manages to miss the shark completely yet land a bullet in Hooper’s neck. Long before reading Melville, I intuited that this was how a naturalistic universe mocked humanity.
Jaws remains a very seventies-novel. I rather like that quality, much as, by contrast, I like that Spielberg’s movie hasn’t aged a day. (Thanks to Deep Blue Sea and Sharknado, we know how un-scary CGI sharks are compared to life-size pneumatic ones). Benchley’s book feels the way the first half of its decade did: amorphous and off-center, dubious of heroes, titillated by dirty talk.
Perhaps I might feel differently if I hadn’t read it on the cusp of adolescence, but Jaws reminds me of how novels attuned me to adult frailties. It’s going overboard to say it exposed me to the sharkish side of humanity, but I could recognize Brody’s resentments, Quint’s unapologetic violence, and Hooper’s sense of sexual entitlement in men I knew. A year after I outgrew my obsession I was berated for entering a community-theater dressing room and discovering a very Mrs. Brody-like friend of my family’s kissing a man I knew wasn’t her husband.
Benchley’s novel certainly made me afraid of the water, but unlike the movie, it did nothing to convince me I was any safer on dry land.
Kirk Curnutt is professor and chair of English at Troy University’s Montgomery, Alabama, campus, where Scott Fitzgerald met Zelda Sayre in 1918. His publications include A Historical Guide to F. Scott Fitzgerald (2004), the novels Breathing Out the Ghost (2008) and Dixie Noir (2009), and Brian Wilson (2012). He is currently at work on a reader’s guide to Ernest Hemingway’s To Have and Have Not.
Subscribe to the OUPblog via email or RSS.
Subscribe to only literature articles on the OUPblog via email or RSS.
Tweet The opening titles of The Adventures of Tintin, while not technically part of the screenplay, offer a jaunty, tongue-in-cheek symposium on the action-adventure genre. Or, that is to say, on the films of Steven Spielberg. There’s a boy, he’s got a companion, in this case a dog, and there is danger and bad guys and [...]
1 Comments on Everything you always wanted to know about The Adventures of Tintin, last added: 2/4/2013
Clearly you have been writing this ever since the movie came out. An impressive article, but I can add a small detail:
“Now, Rackham calls Sir Francis a lapdog of Charles II, which, although harsh, is fair — Sir Francis isn’t transporting the king’s riches for the sake of an orphanage somewhere, after all, he’s the guardian of the wealth of a monarchy, a soldier for the status quo. To Rackham, the king’s ownership of this property is theft, but in the Spielberg mindset, Sir Francis is merely a “good son” to Charles II, making it doubly ironic that Sir Francis’s descendant is the man without a family and it’s the descendant of Rackham who’s looking to regain his family’s heritage.”
Oh, there is more to it. In the original book there are VERY subtle clues that Sir Francis (“François de Hadoque” in the original) could be the king’s own bastard son (in case, king Louis XIV, but Charles II was also well-known for his extramarital affairs), this being a veiled reference to Hergé’s doubts about his own family’s origins, his identical twin father and uncle (inspirations for the Thompsons) being themselves possible bastard sons of Belgium’s own king Leopold II (yet ANOTHER king known for his extramarital affairs!).
By Candy Gourlay
First, let us all take a moment to gaze upon Harrison Ford in his prime.
I've been watching a lot of Making Of videos recently and was struck by director Steven Spielberg's negativity when discussing MY favourite Indiana Jones film, The Temple of Doom.
I loved that film, but googling around I discovered long discourses about how it was too dark and interviews with
25 Comments on Why you have no idea what you're doing, last added: 2/2/2013
I am looking forward to reading Shine one day - I hope you get news soon. It has been very interesting to read about the process you went through with this. Gothic is good :-)
'doing whatever was best at every step of the process.' that's it isn't it? You may plot and plan but until you actually get there - to those places where the story turns - you don't really know what's best.<br />Yep, me too, I want to read it. I know the packagers achieve LOTS of sales but, and this is a genuine question (quick check on google didn't throw anything
I just gave up a short story to a publisher that ended up being a ton darker than I intended it to be. I'm cringing too that I'll see an email saying 'What is this?!' But sometimes a story has to be that way. Congrats on having the guts to do it anyway. Plus, they may like it more than you think ;)
I loved that film too. I even had the souvenir book. But I find it almost impossible to watch now I'm a grown-up! Children are more resilient than we believe.<br />
Can I just say that I bristled a bit at that title, Candy? William Goldman's "Nobody Knows Anything" feels rather less like a personal insult!<br /><br />I get what you're saying, though - so much of this game is out of our hands, and the best books evolve as they go along. Perhaps the key thing is to approach everything with a spirit of experimentation and to embrace the chaos.
I don't think they do win prizes, Jan, but they fill a need. Post coming about that! The first one was scary too but in a different way, with the spirits around the Arc. I don't think children would have seen it as abuse, they'd have seen it as the bad guys getting their comeuppance, which they should always get in this sort of film. I loved it and my kids weren't traumatised by
I don't know if any packaged books have actually won an award, but they do occasionally get shortlisted. I shouldn't think that most publishers bother to submit packaged books for awards though, so that might be skewing the sample.
Great stuff, Candy. Really sits well with Gillian Phillip's post this week about writing from the heart and how heard that is once you start listening to other people's reviews/opinions. Sounds like you've really gone from the heart here: All best luck to you. x<br /><br />In case it's of interest: <br />http://qwillery.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/guest-blog-by-gillian-philip-that.html
I am of the opinion that there SHOULD be an award for books created by packagers. If Enid Blyton were alive today she would probably be involved in some packaged series. Even if packaged series are the result of groupthink I cannot deny that such series have a power and influence. I know a boy who, after devouring Beast Quest, decided that he was an author. Now doesn't that deserve
You have the souvenir book? <br /><br />I must have been a hardbitten child, I saw nothing wrong with it. But when my own sensitive offspring were watching it we had to stop because it was too scary.
I think people take against the fact that packaged books are created by a gang of people for commercial reasons. Is it art? Well - there's good stuff out there!
Comforting to know that even Spielberg's had times where he doesn't quite know where he's going. I agree, you have to write the story that comes. I don't think I'd be much good at the 'packager' writing!
Thanks for answering my packaging question.<br />I was thinking specifically about flexibility in planning, which authors writing for packagers don't have as much as others. Flexibility though can result in stories that are too complicated and over-populated - I have one, maybe more, of those. But flexibility i.e. doing 'whatever's best at every step of the process' can also,
Yeah, I'd agree with that, there are some very skilled writers and editors whose efforts are often ignored. But who would run the award? It couldn't be the packagers themselves - is there a trade body who could judge it? And should it be for single books or whole series?
Even Steven Spielberg can get a rejection letter. It seems that Daniel Day-Lewis—who plays Lincoln in Spielberg’s presidential Academy Award Dominated movie, originally did not want to play Abraham Lincoln. Spielberg didn’t let the rejection letter go to waste, he stowed it away for safekeeping and the letter showed up at the awards-podium as reading material last week.
Julie Miller reporter for Vanity Fair wrote, “Before presenting Day-Lewis with the New York Film Critics Circle award for best actor, Speilberg read aloud the Oscar winner’s thoughtful brush-off.”
Here is Steven’s Rejection Letter:
Dear Steven,
It was a real pleasure just to sit and talk with you. I listened very carefully to what you had to say about this compelling history, and I’ve since read the script and found it in all the detail in which it describe these monumental events and in the compassionate portraits of all the principal characters, both powerful and moving. I can’t account for how at any given moment I feel the need to explore life as opposed to another, but I do know that I can only do this work if I feel almost as if there is no choice; that a subject coincides inexplicably with a very personal need and a very specific moment in time. In this case, as fascinated as I was by Abe, it was the fascination of a grateful spectator who longed to see a story told, rather than that of a participant. That’s how I feel now in spite of myself, and though I can’t be sure that this won’t change, I couldn’t dream of encouraging you to keep it open on a mere possibility. I do hope this makes sense Steven, I’m glad you’re making the film, I wish you the strength for it, and I send both my very best wishes and my sincere gratitude to you for having considered me.
Daniel Day-Lewis
What can we learn from this? Well, Spielberg didn’t give up. After receiving the letter, he recruited Tony Kushner to pen a new screenplay from Doris Kearns Goodwin’s biography of Lincoln, Team of Rivals—one that would earn Day-Lewis’s approval. Apparently he did, because Lincoln is positioned to run away with the Oscars in February.
So the next time you get a rejection letter, keep this story in mind and revise your manuscript. Revision does improve our work and sometimes we just need someone to pull our best out of us.
I’m printing this one out, for sure, Kathy! Maybe even frame it! lol
What strikes me the most is that Stephen, especially considering his success, has never let his ego become inflated in a way that has made him automatically dismiss the opinions of others. He took Daniel’s thoughtful comments to heart and re-examined the screenplay. Both their attitudes are worthy of admiration and they were ultimately able to acheive excellence because of it
I haven’t watched award shows in years because I’m just really sick of competition, generally, but I’ve heard “Lincoln” is an outstanding film and I plan to see it when it’s available on DVD
Thanks for posting this, Kathy!
simondillon said, on 1/14/2013 7:13:00 AM
To quote George McFly in Back to the Future: “I just can’t take that kind of rejection!”
Actually, I can. After countless rejections, two agents and two near publications that fell through, I have started to self-publish online and so far it has been very successful.
At this point I am simply trying to get my name and works noticed, and the reviews for both Uncle Flynn and George goes to Mars are good, which is encouraging. By all means have a read – both are downloadable for free, or you can get print copies from Lulu.com.
darlenebeckjacobson said, on 1/14/2013 8:33:00 AM
This is an inspiring post and a great lesson for those of us who think rejection is the end. In many cases it is the beginning…of a new path and new story. Thanks for sharing.
Deb Lund said, on 1/14/2013 11:27:00 AM
So true, Kathy.
Chris Vogler told another story about the Lincoln movie, and I hope I’ll get the story correct (we fiction writers love to fill in details, you know!). Sally Field was originally considered to play Mrs. Lincoln, but then, as the movie took much longer to make than they had planned, they said she was too old for the part. She didn’t accept that, asked to at least audition, and when they saw how she played the part with Day-Lewis, she was back in the role.
That doesn’t mean we should send manuscripts back to someone who just rejected us (without a strong reason), as Kathy would tell you, but it’s always good to take another look. Celebrate those rejections! They mean you’re doing what you’ve dreamed of doing, and your rejected manuscripts are one step closer to finding the right home. It’s not about bucking up. It’s about realizing rejections are a gift.
Thanks so much, Kathy…
Great post!
Kathy Temean said, on 1/14/2013 3:45:00 PM
Deb,
Here, here! Totally agree. Nice story, thanks for sharing.
Kathy
jennigreenmiller said, on 1/14/2013 6:39:00 PM
found this via Knitting With Pencils…. Thanks for writing!
Kathy Temean said, on 1/14/2013 10:43:00 PM
Jenni,
Welcome! Hope you stop back.
Kathy
Kathy Temean said, on 1/14/2013 10:48:00 PM
Darlene,
How is your path going? I think you may have e-mailed me about going to lunch, but I am not sure. I could have hallucinated it. I’ve been sick in bed, since December 16th. How anyone could sleep so much is beyond me. I must have set a record. On my third antibiotic. To tired and too weak to even read in bed. I’m going to have to start my New Year Resolutions in February.
Kathy
:Donna Marie said, on 1/14/2013 10:55:00 PM
Really not liking the “third antibiotic” thing
Kathy Temean said, on 1/14/2013 11:00:00 PM
Donna,
Had to change the antibiotic, because I was getting sicker on the second one he gave me. I feel a little better after the switch.
The first trailer for Steven Spielberg‘s The Adventures of Tintin: Secret of the Unicorn has been released. Above, we’ve embedded the trailer.
What do you think about this first peek at the footage? The adaptation of Herge’s beloved Tintin series hits theaters December 23rd.
Here’s more about the film: “Paramount Pictures and Columbia Pictures Present a 3D Motion Capture Film ‘The Adventures of Tintin’ directed by Steven Spielberg from a screenplay by Steven Moffat and Edgar Wright & Joe Cornish. Starring Jamie Bell (“Billy Elliot,” “Defiance”) as Tintin, the intrepid young reporter whose relentless pursuit of a good story thrusts him into a world of high adventure, and Daniel Craig (“Quantum of Solace,” “Defiance”) as the nefarious Red Rackham.” (Via i09)
French film site Films Actu has what look to be more Empire mag scans of the Steven Spielberg-directed Tintin movie. They show the Thompson/Dupin twins, villain Barnaby and the endless desert. Also, based on these stills, Tintin will spend the entire movie with his face obscured or in shadow.
While there may be some perception that comic book movie fever is cooling off, at least one super-epic-mega film that will change the world is in the works — the Steven Spielberg/Peter Jackson Tintin 3D-mocap-CGI epic. Spielberg is directing while Jackson produces The Adventures of Tintin: Secret of the Unicorn, which comes out 12/23/11. The cast includes Jamie Bell, Daniel Craig, Andy Serkis, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Gad Elmaleh, Toby Jones, Mackenzie Crook, Carey Elwes, and Daniel Mays, most of whom did mocap or supplied vocal talents. This far, details of the movie have been closely guarded — Tintin being one of the world’s most popular characters — although not so much in America. From a business standpoint, a successful film could relaunch the Tintin books in the English speaking world, WATCHMEN style. With so much talent involved, expectations are high.
Still can’t see whether Tintin has those characteristic button eyes…
Jeremy said, on 11/1/2010 11:25:00 AM
It is a bit of a cheat that the first released images are all hiding Tintin’s face in shadow. Captain Haddock looks a bit like Andy Serkis, but I’m sure that’s intentional.
Snowy (Milou!) looks just right.
This kind of material is just perfect for Spielberg, and the cast is good. I suspect it will do well.
Randy @ WCG Comics said, on 11/1/2010 4:47:00 PM
It looks like they gave Tintin a more generic/less cartoony face (not saying that’s bad, just making the observation). Snowy does look pretty identical.
I must admit that Captain Haddock looks a bit troll-ish in the still — but that last shot of them on the overturned boat looks pretty impressive.
Moubius44 said, on 11/1/2010 5:17:00 PM
Yeah must say looks cool,but will it retain that orignal spirit from the graphic novels. A lot of people in Europe grew up with reading tin tin so. But i have no doubt it will be great for the t shirt and sell tickets. Who will daniel craig look like ?? A mixture of Andy Sirkis ??
maggie said, on 11/1/2010 6:01:00 PM
I am incredibly dubious. I’m not sure why they decided with to go with such a heavy handed rendered style of animation– part of the appeal of the original was the simplicity and starkness of the illustrations. Just because one is capable of animating 10,000 hairs on a character’s head doesn’t mean they necessarily should. It’s not Avatar, it’s Tintin.
Richard Tucker said, on 11/1/2010 7:48:00 PM
Not that my opinion matters one wit but I’m not likely to see this. Once again the effort to get this character seen has been engulfed by a high tech, multi-million dollar effort to convince us that high tech can improve and hand drawn comics that captured our imagination without even the need of a light bulb to be embraced as fun. I don’t expect that many will understand that but I also don’t expect those who look to Hollywood all the time for entertainment validation to care either.
Matt M. said, on 11/1/2010 9:33:00 PM
Too many details. They’re looking to lose the forest, but every photorealistic tree will be in its appointed place, dammit.
Box Brown said, on 11/2/2010 6:22:00 AM
Why couldn’t they do a 3-d Ligne Clare? It’s so weird looking and complicated.
TinWin! said, on 11/2/2010 8:31:00 AM
In a way motion capture makes sense, because the drawings were so cold and lifeless -and I say that as a fan of the Herge style. (Of course the movie won’t be as flat and lifeless as the drawings, but close:)). Also, Tintin has already been done successfully in 2D as a TV series, for those who want that.
hedge said, on 11/2/2010 4:21:00 PM
Is it my imagination but does he look like Pete Campbell?
Jim Engel-Home said, on 11/2/2010 4:38:00 PM
When I heard Jackson & Spielberg were doing a CG TINTIN, I wasn’t sure… I’ve loved Herge’s work since childhood… then I heard a lot about what faithful fans they were, and I started looking forward to seeing Herge’s lovely, appealing DRAWING STYLE adapted to 3-D animation. HIS STYLE. Herge’s style. 3D cartoons. CARTOONS! Not “TINTIN ON THE POLAR EXPRESS”.
In the first of what we hope are many journalistic coups, The Indubitable Dweeb has managed to land an interview with the erstwhile most-wanted-man-in-America, accused Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad. We asked some tough questions. He gave some surprising answers. No matter what you think of miranda rights and the role of bloggers in the reporting of terrorism, you’ll want to read this fascinating journey into the mind of a man who a few days before was just another immigrant, another face in the crowd.
ID: Let’s start with your name. Faisal Shahzad. That’s not a name most Americans are familiar with, or certainly comfortable with. Is there something else we can call you? A nickname? Anything like that?
FS: Sure, sure. A lot of people, they call me Fievel.
ID: Like the cartoon mouse?
FS: Exactly! An American Tail. It’s a funny story actually. Back in Pakistan, when I was a kid, my sister and I, we use to love to sing together. Duets, you know? There was a talent show at the local mosque and we signed up to do Close My Eyes Forever, which is a song by Lita Ford and Ozzy Osbourne.
ID: We’re familiar with the song.
FS: Showstopper, right? Anyhoo, the night before the talent show, we see this movie. This cartoon. And there’s this song. Somewhere Out There. It’s sung by cartoon mice and it’s out of tune and it’s almost like a bad Andrew Lloyd Webber ballad, but damn it, it works. I’m telling you, it absolutely breaks your heart. So we ditched the ripped jeans and teased hair which, come to think of it, weren’t exactly Taliban-friendly, and we sported some rags and mouse ears and sang Somewhere Out There. And we killed. Just blew the beards right off the crowd. The next morning, people started calling me Fievel. “Keep wishing on that same bright star, Fievel!” That sort of thing. A few years later, I went through a Gomer Pyle phase, I tried to convince people to call me Shazam!, but it never took. It was Fievel then. It’s still Fievel now.
ID: You are aware that Fievel is Jewish, aren’t you?
FS (after a long pause): But he is a mouse?
ID: Yes. A Russian Jewish mouse. His last name is Mousekewitz.
FS: No. You’re wrong. I have the blu-ray at home. I watch it once a year. I’m pretty sure he’s Chechen or something.
ID: Fair enough. You’re entitled to your interpretation. In any case, do you find yourself relating to Fievel’s story.
FS: You know, I do. I was an immigrant to America, just like him. I’m not particularly fond of cats, just like him. There are a lot of coincidences between our stories.
ID: Did Fievel ever try to blow up Times Square?
FS: Well, no…but that doesn’t mean he didn’t want to. It’s never stated explicitly, but I’ve always assumed that sometime before he reached America, Fievel travelled to Pakistan for some training in explosives. There’s a scene where he unleashes the
Tweets that mention Our Interview with Faisal Shah said, on 5/7/2010 1:21:00 PM
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Aaron Starmer. Aaron Starmer said: Scoop! The Indubitable Dweeb interviews Faisal Shahzad. Don Bluth fans will be shocked. http://bit.ly/97vV6Y [...]
Clearly you have been writing this ever since the movie came out. An impressive article, but I can add a small detail:
“Now, Rackham calls Sir Francis a lapdog of Charles II, which, although harsh, is fair — Sir Francis isn’t transporting the king’s riches for the sake of an orphanage somewhere, after all, he’s the guardian of the wealth of a monarchy, a soldier for the status quo. To Rackham, the king’s ownership of this property is theft, but in the Spielberg mindset, Sir Francis is merely a “good son” to Charles II, making it doubly ironic that Sir Francis’s descendant is the man without a family and it’s the descendant of Rackham who’s looking to regain his family’s heritage.”
Oh, there is more to it. In the original book there are VERY subtle clues that Sir Francis (“François de Hadoque” in the original) could be the king’s own bastard son (in case, king Louis XIV, but Charles II was also well-known for his extramarital affairs), this being a veiled reference to Hergé’s doubts about his own family’s origins, his identical twin father and uncle (inspirations for the Thompsons) being themselves possible bastard sons of Belgium’s own king Leopold II (yet ANOTHER king known for his extramarital affairs!).
Details about Hergé’s possible royal heritage here, so that you won’t think I’m making stuff up:
http://socyberty.com/history/tintin-on-the-couch-to-tell-herg/
So, in more than one fashion, the treasure IS Haddock’s family treasure. And sure enough he wins it for himself in both the comic and the movie.
Yes, for a boy’s adventure comic, Tintin is incredibly layered. That’s why it is the most studied comic series in the world!